Reaction between potassiumhydrogensulfate & potassiumhydroxide

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcfaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The reaction between potassium hydrogen sulfate (KHSO4) and potassium hydroxide (KOH) is identified as a proton-transfer reaction, indicating it is also an acid-base reaction. Despite KHSO4 being a salt, it retains the ability to react with bases. The discussion emphasizes that the terms "acid" and "base" are relative, allowing for varied interpretations based on context. The dissociation of potassium hydrogen sulfate is relevant for understanding its behavior in reactions. Overall, the interaction between these compounds illustrates the complexity of acid-base chemistry beyond traditional definitions.
mcfaker
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is the reaction between potassiumhydrogensulfate & potassiumhydroxide a proton-transfer reaction? If it is, it must also be an acid-base reaction. But the problem is that its not a reaction between an acid & base, but between a salt & a base!


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write formula of potassium hydrogen sulfate and dissociation reaction for the salt.
 
Just because it happens to be a "salt", it doesn't means it always loses its ability to react with other acid or base. And also, acid and base are relative terms, so don't worry about KHSO4 being acidic or basic.
 
Thanks for the help Borek & Agnuke. :)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top