Reaction using Castiglano's method.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohamadh95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Reaction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Castigliano's method for solving a problem involving reactions and forces in a beam. Participants are exploring how to properly set up the problem, including the introduction of reactions and forces in their equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about whether to include the reaction Ra when writing equations and questions whether the force P should equal Rc or Vc.
  • Another participant suggests that including RA is necessary if it is part of the free body diagram (fbd) being analyzed, emphasizing the need for equilibrium statements.
  • A later reply proposes a method of cutting the beam at point C and restoring it with a force P, suggesting that the upward deflection caused by P should equal the downward deflection calculated with reaction C removed.
  • Participants acknowledge that this may be one of the original poster's first exercises, indicating a need for clearer guidance on the approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best approach to take, as participants are still clarifying their understanding and methods. Multiple viewpoints on how to set up the problem remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions regarding the forces and reactions involved, and there may be missing steps in the mathematical reasoning required to apply Castigliano's method effectively.

mohamadh95
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit lost. I began by the cuts but then got lost: should I introduce the reactions like Ra when writing the equations? And about the force P I should introduce, should it be equal to Rc or Vc? If anyone could give me the proper plan on how to solve this problem I will be thankful. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0046.jpg
    DSC_0046.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone??
 
Good start, but it would be better to have a plan at the beginning. Yes, you do include RA if it is in the free body diagram (fbd) you have isolated in your cut, because you are making equilibrium statements for all the actions on the fbd you have. The overall plan is that, having cut the beam's moment at C, you will have to restore it with another equation so that the continuity at C is maintained. However, it is clear that this is one of your first exercises. It would be easier to understand if you were to 'cut' (that is, remove) the reaction at C, calculate the deflection there, and 'restore' the reaction with a force P with the property that its upward deflection equals the downwards deflection you have calculated with reaction C removed. The same principle can be applied to the moment cut you have introduced, but it's not so easy to explain or achieve.
 
thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K