Reading proofs - impeding learning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werg22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs Reading
AI Thread Summary
Reading proofs can impede learning by removing the essential thinking process required for problem-solving. While some argue that looking at proofs can provide valuable techniques and insights, others believe that it detracts from developing problem-solving skills. Engaging with a proof after attempting the problem can be beneficial, as it allows for reflection on one's approach and understanding of different techniques. It is important to attempt the problem independently before consulting the proof to maximize learning. Ultimately, balancing independent problem-solving with reading proofs can enhance mathematical understanding.
Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
When solving a problem, the last thing you want to do is look at the solution. When you're trying to prove a theorem, axiom or whatever, is looking at a proof something that would impede your learning? To me it seems that the answer is yes. Looking at a proof removes the thinking process so essential to learning. What's you're take on that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
reading a proof helps you try to learn the process to prove a similar problem or to learn tricks that may combine on a totally different problem in math.

Hence when reading a proving techniques proof. You read through them and then apply it to the text problems.
 
Just take a minute to think of how you would attack the problem. If you've been working through a textbook and you come to a new result, you should usually know everything required for the proof. So it never hurts to give it a little bit of thought on your own before going ahead and reading it.
 
Data said:
you should usually know everything required for the proof.

Hmmm... I disagree with that.

There are many proofs that have many spins on them that not that many people would have thought of it. In fact, usually only one person has thought of it.
 
It is important to solve proofs to build skills, but it is also important to read proofs so that you have a body of knowledge and techniques to draw from.
 
Werg22 said:
When you're trying to prove a theorem, axiom or whatever,
If you are trying to prove an axiom you have much bigger problems than "looking ahead"
 
Werg22 said:
When solving a problem, the last thing you want to do is look at the solution. When you're trying to prove a theorem, axiom or whatever, is looking at a proof something that would impede your learning? To me it seems that the answer is yes. Looking at a proof removes the thinking process so essential to learning. What's you're take on that?

Is your question about when trying prove theorem A and can't do it. It would be bad to just look up theorem A in a book?

So it's just like looking up a solution to a problem that you can't do. That is always not recommanded but compare to spending 3 or more hours doing that problem when you have other subjects as well, I would look up the solution. At least you can learn something from looking at the solution. But make sure you have a good go at the problem or proof first.
 
Also, when you're doing a problem, it's ok to look at the solution after awhile of not solving. Just think about the techniques you think you would take, but just can't finish it up. And see if they used that technique, if not, you learn a new, if yes, then you know you're going in the right direction and learn how to apply it.
 
Back
Top