Real & Imaginary Parts of Complex Signals Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter inadaze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Imaginary
inadaze
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I was wondering if anyone could explain to me the meaning of "real and imaginary parts of a complex signal"?

Thanks
Jay
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
im going to ignore the signal part..

but in a form of say z = a + ib where i= \sqrt{-1}

the a is the real part, and
the ib is the imaginary
 
cronxeh said:
im going to ignore the signal part..

but in a form of say z = a + ib where i= \sqrt{-1}

the a is the real part, and
the ib is the imaginary

In some textbooks, the "Imaginary Part of z" is defined Im(z)=b, a real number.
So, z=Re(z)+i Im(z).

Using the notation z* for the "complex-conjugate of z"...
To determine Re(z) from z, use Re(z)=(z+z*)/2.
To determine Im(z) from z, use Im(z)=(z-z*)/2i.
 
laymen

Thanks for your reply.
What I failed to mention was that I have a very low understanding of math. Could you explain that again in laymen terms.

Thanks
Jay
 
If you can provide us some context for where you read this quote, we can probably be more helpful. Normally complex numbers are used to simplify the mathematical treatment of engineering problems, but all physically possible signals are real only.

- Warren
 
In the complex number system, there are two axes: the horizontal real axis and the vertical imaginary axis. The imaginary part of a number can be ositioned along the imaginary axis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top