Real World Gravity on an incline question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the load exerted on tow straps and a tree by a 3000 lb. recreational trailer positioned on a 10-degree incline. The user, Jeff, seeks validation for his calculations using the formula for gravitational force parallel to an incline, ultimately determining a load of approximately 520 lbs. Responses confirm that Jeff's approach is correct, emphasizing that the force parallel to the incline is indeed the relevant measurement for assessing the load on the straps and tree. Additionally, advice is given to ensure that the D rings and straps are adequately strong to prevent failure. Overall, the calculations and safety considerations are affirmed as appropriate for the scenario.
Jeff Long
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm brushing up on my physics, and I have a real world problem I've chosen to solve!

First the Word Problem part of it, then the Physics after that...

I have a 3000 lb. Recreational Trailer that I wish to put on my driveway on the side. The driveway is at a 10 degree angle from level. Above the driveway (on the side where the trailer will go) is a Palm tree that's just huge, that I wish to attach it to.

I have had welded onto the back of the trailer two D rings that swivel, welded to the frame (one on each side, left and right), and have backed the trailer up the driveway. I have attached two tow straps, one has a breaking strength of 20,000 lbs., and it's 8 ft. fixed length, and I've simply gone from D ring around the tree to D ring. As a backup, I have an adjustable-length tow strap that has a WLL of 3300 lbs. and a breaking strength of 10,000 lbs., and it attaches to the trailer at the 1 1/4" hitch welded at the back/middle of the rear of the trailer, goes around the tree also, and returns to the same hitch. It's tightened to match the first tow strap, so that if either strap breaks, the other will hold it with no shock loading. Essentially the trailer is held with two separate loop systems. It seems to be holding fine, and the tree seems fine as well.

What I want to calculate, is the actual load I'm putting on the straps/tree. So I'm hoping someone can validate my math. This *should be* a gravity on an incline problem. So the value I want should be F parallel, rather than F perpendicular, which is the same as F normal. I am assuming that the trailer is at rest and held in place and friction of the wheels in the axle in layers of grease are minimal, and so I'm not bothering subtracting friction for this problem.

Seems like the equation should be:

F parallel = m * g * sin (theta)

where m = mass (3000 lb. trailer = 1360 kg), gravity is 9.80665 (technically it's 9.79593 as I've calculated local gravity, but I'll go with 9.8 for this explanation).

F parallel = 13,328N * sin(10)
F parallel = 13,328 * 0.1736481777
F parallel = 2,314.3829 N
so the load (foot pounds of force?) = F parallel / g
load = 236.161 kg or 520.646 lbs.

I assume I screwed at least one thing up royally. It just seems too easy and I must have botched something. Any help would be appreciated!

Note: Please don't go over my head without explanation. The more detailed the answer the more likely I am to understand (especially with math steps taken and none skipped). THANK YOU! It's been many years since I took physics classes...

Cheers,
jeff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to convert to metric, the gravity force parallel to incline is ( 3000 )(sin 10 ) pounds or 520 pounds.
 
I see. That makes sense. I also see I didn't need to convert to mass by dividing by g then multiplying by g... I assume that I am correct that the gravity force parallel to incline is in fact what I am looking for, the load on the tow straps/tree?

Thank you!

Cheers,
Jeff
 
Yes correct. The D eyes need similar strength. You don't want the eyes to be the weak spot. Protect the straps from cutting into the tree. The loading is rather small I would say.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top