Real world prob: bending of 26mT circular plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the structural analysis of a 26mT circular steel plate with an 11m diameter and 35mm thickness, which is to be lifted using trunions. The user calculated the second moment of area and section modulus based on a simply supported beam model, acknowledging the limitations of this approach due to the plate's welding configuration. Key concerns include stress concentration at the trunions and potential buckling under the plate's weight, leading to the decision to add stiffeners for enhanced support.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural engineering principles, specifically bending stress and moment calculations.
  • Familiarity with stress concentration factors and their application in structural analysis.
  • Knowledge of welding techniques and their impact on structural integrity.
  • Experience with beam theory and its limitations in complex geometries.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research stress concentration factors using Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain.
  • Study the effects of adding stiffeners to circular plates under load.
  • Explore advanced beam modeling techniques to account for non-uniform cross-sections.
  • Learn about finite element analysis (FEA) for more accurate stress distribution assessments.
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of heavy lifting systems and welded structures.

chocolatebelt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'd like to check my work on this to make sure a safe lift is done.

We have an 11m diameter, 35mm thick, 26mT circular steel plate to which we will add two trunions at the ends. The circular plate is welded in 4 parts and once we weld one side we have to flip to weld the other. That is what the trunions are for. The welding for one side will mean the plates are only connected by half their cross section (35mm / 2) before flipping, so this is what I have used for second moment of area and section modulus.

I kept it simple and used a simply supported beam and calculated both as a center point load (worst case) and uniformly distributed load separately. I'm assuming no correction for dynamic loading and no stress concentration (though there will be I think) due to the other [open] side of the weld as it is a double v joint. I know using the simply supported beam is technically not correct as the theory assumes a constant cross section, so therefore I would like to check with the forum how you would go about solving this! The trunions are another problem altogether but I would first like to check whether we can lift the plate as is or if it needs stiffeners to prevent buckling under own weight.

Thanks for looking and your solutions. Regards
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
An important thing you're missing is the stress concentration at the narrow region. You may be able to apply a stress concentration factor from a book like Roark's.
 
Unrest said:
An important thing you're missing is the stress concentration at the narrow region. You may be able to apply a stress concentration factor from a book like Roark's.

Thanks for the quick reply. I don't actually have the Roark's book. Is it as simple as taking the max stress at center and applying a multiplier for the region around the trunions, or how would you do it?
 
As I understand, your cross-section looks like a straight beam with a v-notch in the middle? You'd find the bending stress with no notch, then apply a factor according to the geometry of the notch.

A beam model may be even worse since it can try to bend in two directions - like a potato chip.
 
Unrest said:
As I understand, your cross-section looks like a straight beam with a v-notch in the middle? You'd find the bending stress with no notch, then apply a factor according to the geometry of the notch.

A beam model may be even worse since it can try to bend in two directions - like a potato chip.

hey,

I'm familiar with using a multiplier for stress concentrations, I just don't know how to calculate the stress at the trunnions as I am calculating it as a simply supported beam where moments are of course zero at supports.

It's ok though, we have decided to add stiffeners so thanks for your input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K