Really n00bish beginners' question about motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter FeynmanMH42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginners Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that while every action has an equal and opposite reaction, these forces act on different objects, which allows for net forces to exist. For example, when a person walks, they exert a force on the sidewalk, and the sidewalk exerts an equal force back, but these forces do not cancel each other out since they act on separate bodies. The concept of net force is relevant only when considering a single object, and when analyzing a system as a whole, such as a bullet and a gun, the net force can be zero. Momentum is conserved in such systems, illustrating that if the net force on all parts is zero, the center of mass remains in uniform motion. Understanding these principles helps clarify how motion occurs despite the presence of equal and opposite forces.
FeynmanMH42
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
If for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, then how come net forces exist?
Surely when a force is exerted on an object, an equal force must push back (reaction) in the opposite direction, therefore balancing the forces, creating no net force and thus no acceleration?
How do things move at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the reaction force acts on a different object.
 
When walking, you exert a force on the sidewalk. In turn, the sidewalk exerts a force on you. The sidewalk doesn't pull and push you at the same time.
 
I shall just echo the above posts:

While every force does have an equal an opposite reaction force, these forces act on two different bodies.

Think of a bullet leaving a gun: they both experience the same force in opposite directions; the much larger mass of the gun + dude with gun compared to the mass of the bullet means that the bullet flies off, but the gun recoils a bit (well not as much anyway).
 
Ahh, the whole topic of mechanics makes sense now. :p
 
So, arguably, I suppose the OP is right when he questions the "net force". If he looks at the whole system - the bullet and gun, there is no net force. It is only if you look at a part of the system - just the nasty part of the bullet-gun combo - that you see a net force.
 
DaveC426913 said:
If he looks at the whole system - the bullet and gun, there is no net force.

Indeed. That's why momentum is conserved, when the whole system is considered.
 
Or to put it another way, if the net force on all parts of the system is zero, the center of mass of the system remains at rest, or continues moving in a straight line at constant speed. That is, the center of mass of the system obeys Newton's First Law, in this situation.
 
well the reaction and action force act on two different bodies .when you are talking about net force you are only considering one body , but yes if you consider both bodies together the net result might be zero
 
Back
Top