Admissions Reapplying to graduate programs

AI Thread Summary
Reapplying to graduate programs after receiving rejection letters raises questions about the application process, particularly regarding GRE scores and recommendation letters. Improving GRE scores before the next application cycle is crucial, but applicants may wonder if they can reuse parts of their previous application. Some schools allow the use of prior recommendation letters, though the strength of these letters may diminish over time due to lack of recent contact with professors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of evaluating the quality of potential programs. If a school is deemed mediocre or poor based on personal experience, it may be worth waiting to reapply rather than accepting an unsatisfactory offer. Conversely, if the assessment is based solely on rankings, applicants are encouraged to explore the program further, as initial interest may still hold value. Ultimately, the decision should balance personal fit with academic aspirations.
hunter151
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Well, as the rejection letters start coming in, I can't help but wonder what it takes to reapply to graduate programs. I believe my application this time around was strong in all aspects except GRE scores (which were quite miserable).

So my question is, if I improve my GRE scores significantly before dec 09, and decide to apply to the same programs I applied to in dec 08, do I have to go through the entire process again? The main problem with this is recommendation letters, since rec letters cannot be as strong a year after having no contact with a professor, as they were during/right after research or classes.

So this is the question, if I choose to reapply for next year, can I use aspects of this year's application, or will I be starting fresh from a clean slate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
some schools will let you use the recommendation from your previous app.
 
hunter151 said:
The main problem with this is recommendation letters, since rec letters cannot be as strong a year after having no contact with a professor, as they were during/right after research or classes.

I doubt very much that the professor would write a brand new letter from scratch.
 
Thanks for the responses.

Does anyone have personal experience with this? I have a feeling that I will have to choose between going to a school with mediocre/poor physics department (where I already got in with funding), or waiting it out and improving my GRE scores to take another stab at it next year. Any suggestions of what you would do in my shoes?
 
I think it depends on what you mean by "mediocre/poor." If it means that you've visited the school and were not impressed with the professors, don't believe you would enjoy doing any of the research that is available, don't like the courses they offer, feel like you would be used as a lab technician, or watched the other grad students that you spoke with twitch nervously as they told you come and join the collective - then I would say wait.

However, if the assessment is based largely on external information - such as you initially wanted a 'top 20' school and this one is ranked at 82nd - I would suggest giving it a shot, or at least visiting and/or speaking with the professors over email to see if anyone has a project you would be interested in. After all, when you applied in the first place, something must have caught your attention about the school.

In general, you don't want to turn down an opportunity just because it doesn't have a flashy sign.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top