Rearrange Formula: 2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2 to Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around rearranging the equation 2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2 into the standard quadratic form Ax² + Bx + C = 0. Participants are examining their attempts and verifying the correctness of their rearrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their rearrangements and seek validation of their results. Some express confusion about the signs in their equations and the implications of different forms of the same equation. Others question the validity of their steps and the assumptions made during the rearrangement process.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the rearrangements presented by participants, with some receiving feedback on their work. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being explored, and there is a recognition of the importance of notation and clarity in presenting mathematical expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the original equation, specifically the values of x that lead to division by zero (x ≠ 2 and x ≠ -2). There is also a discussion about the standard form of polynomial equations and the significance of maintaining a positive leading coefficient.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
1. Rearrange the following equation
2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2
into the form Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

I did it and got -x2 + 8x + 4 = 0

Am I correct please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Natasha1 said:
1. Rearrange the following equation
2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2
into the form Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

I did it and got -x2 + 8x + 4 = 0

Am I correct please?
Could you please show your step-by-step work? That will make it easier for us to check it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Looks good to me. You should usually show your work in step-by-step fashion. Trying to do too much in your head is slow and error-prone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
See picture attached for working out
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-11-04 at 20.40.51.png
    Screen Shot 2016-11-04 at 20.40.51.png
    19.6 KB · Views: 496
Natasha1 said:
1. Rearrange the following equation
2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2
into the form Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

I did it and got -x2 + 8x + 4 = 0

Am I correct please?

No, your final equation in incorrect. Start again, and this time do it the easy way: re-write ##2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2)## by putting both terms over a common denominator. I really could not figure out what you were trying to do in your original working, but whatever it was produced errors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Where am I going wrong... I need to rearrange the following equation 2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2 into the form Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

Here's my work:

2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2

2 + 2(x-2)/(x+2) - (x-2)/2 = 0
2(x+2) + 2(x-2) - (x-2)(x+2)/2 = 0
4(x+2)+4(x-2)-(x-2)(x+2) = 0
4x+8+4x-8-(x2 - 2x+2x-4) = 0
8x-x2+4 = 0
-x2 +8x+4 = 0
 
I think that your answer is correct ... with two caveats.
1) Always keep track of values of x that are invalid: x=2 or x=-2 cause a divide by 0 in the original equation. So always add the constraints x≠2; x≠-2. (Click on the 'Σ' button at the top of the entry window to get the '≠' symbol, among others.)
2) Use clear notation for the exponent 2. If you do not have superscripts, type x^2. (On the web site, click on the 'x2' button at the top of the entry window to get superscripts.)

So your final equation should look like:
-x2 +8x+4 = 0; x ≠ +2; x ≠ -2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natasha1
Natasha1 said:
Where am I going wrong... I need to rearrange the following equation 2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2 into the form Ax2+ Bx + C = 0

Here's my work:

2/(x-2) + 2/(x+2) = 1/2

2 + 2(x-2)/(x+2) - (x-2)/2 = 0
2(x+2) + 2(x-2) - (x-2)(x+2)/2 = 0
4(x+2)+4(x-2)-(x-2)(x+2) = 0
4x+8+4x-8-(x2 - 2x+2x-4) = 0
8x-x2+4 = 0
-x2 +8x+4 = 0

Sorry: I missed the minus sign in front of your x^2 term, so ##x^2 -8x - 4=0## IS correct. You wrote it as ##-x^2 + 8x + 4 = 0##, but the usual way of writing polynomial equations is to have the coefficient of the highest power of ##x## being positive (so with ##+x^2## instead of ##-x^2##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natasha1 and FactChecker
FactChecker said:
I think that your answer is correct ... with two caveats.
1) Always keep track of values of x that are invalid: x=2 or x=-2 cause a divide by 0 in the original equation. So always add the constraints x≠2; x≠-2. (Click on the 'Σ' button at the top of the entry window to get the '≠' symbol, among others.)
2) Use clear notation for the exponent 2. If you do not have superscripts, type x^2. (On the web site, click on the 'x2' button at the top of the entry window to get superscripts.)

So your final equation should look like:
-x2 +8x+4 = 0; x ≠ +2; x ≠ -2
I'm sorry thank you for the advice
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #10
Ray Vickson said:
Sorry: I missed the minus sign in front of your x^2 term, so ##x^2 -8x - 4=0## IS correct. You wrote it as ##-x^2 + 8x + 4 = 0##, but the usual way of writing polynomial equations is to have the coefficient of the highest power of ##x## being positive (so with ##+x^2## instead of ##-x^2##).

Why is it then I get two different solution for both equations -x^2 + 8x +4 = 0 and x^2 -8x - 4 = 0 ?
 
  • #11
Natasha1 said:
Why is it then I get two different solution for both equations -x^2 + 8x +4 = 0 and x^2 -8x - 4 = 0 ?

They are not two different equations! If ##x^2 -8x-4=0## then also ##0 = -0 = -(8x^2 -8x-4) = -x^2 + 8x + 4##.

OK, I guess you could say they are different, just as ##5x^2 - 40 x - 20=0## looks different; but they are all just simple multiples of each other, and they all have exactly the same solutions.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
They are not two different equations! If ##x^2 -8x-4=0## then also ##0 = -0 = -(8x^2 -8x-4) = -x^2 + 8x + 4##.

OK, I guess you could say they are different, just as ##5x^2 - 40 x - 20=0## looks different; but they are all just simple multiples of each other, and they all have exactly the same solutions.
@Natasha1 ,

Thus they are called equivalent equations .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K