Recalling the Equation for Slit Width in a Double Slit Interference Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter KBriggs
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment, specifically in relation to the angle theta of the interference maxima. A participant suggests that the equation for fringe width, W = (Dλ)/S, may be relevant, where W is fringe width, D is the distance from the slits to the screen, λ is the wavelength of light, and S is the slit separation. However, the original poster clarifies that they are seeking the actual size of the slits rather than fringe width. The conversation highlights the need for a formula that directly relates to slit width without relying on intensity measurements. The request for assistance remains open as the specific equation for slit width is not provided.
KBriggs
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I need to get the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment (not the distance between slits) that depends on the angle theta to the intferference maxima, and any distances involved in the typical setup. I found one on the forum that involves the intensity of the maxima, but I have no way to measure intensity. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KBriggs said:
Hey all,

I need to get the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment (not the distance between slits) that depends on the angle theta to the intferference maxima, and any distances involved in the typical setup. I found one on the forum that involves the intensity of the maxima, but I have no way to measure intensity. Any help?

well do you mean fringe width over here..!if yes then equation goes like this..

W = (Dλ)/S

Where,
W= fringe width
D=distance from slits to screen
λ= WAVELENGTH of light
S=slit seperation(distance between the slits)..

I hope this is the formula you were looking for.
 
Not the fringe width, but the size of the two slits. ie, the size of the larger gaps in the little diagram here.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|
|
 

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Explanation for bright fringes in Single Slit Diffraction
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How to improve the accuracy of Young's double slit experiment?
Replies
11
Views
3K
B Young's Double slit experiment with different slit sizes
Replies
20
Views
6K
I Young's double slit: why fringes gets dimmer and inconsistent?
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Why is there no single slit interference when one slit is closed in a double slit experiment?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
Diffraction pattern from a grating
Replies
3
Views
799
I The probability density function for the double-slit experiment
Replies
19
Views
3K
B Purity of Interference Pattern in a Classical Double-slit Experiment
Replies
23
Views
2K
Intensity of central maximum when width of single slit is doubled
Replies
13
Views
1K
A Double slit experiment using entangled photons
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top