Received power for free space optics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating received power in free space optics (FSO), where the user encountered an illogical result of 10.72 dBm, exceeding the transmitted power of 7.78 dBm. The calculations involved system loss, receiver diameter, and divergence angle, but the user was informed that the beam did not fully illuminate the receiver area, leading to errors. It was emphasized that the divergence angle must be greater than the receiver diameter for the formula to be applicable. Additionally, the conversation highlighted the need for clarity in the methods used, suggesting reliance on established formulas like the Friis transmission equation for better accuracy. The discussion concludes with a critique of the complexity in optical engineering calculations.
Nur Ziadah
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

I have calculated the received power for free space optic (FSO) using the equation:
upload_2019-1-6_16-35-28.png

Lsystem (system loss) is set to 8dB. PTotal can be calculated as:
upload_2019-1-6_16-36-9.png

where Ntx (number of receiver) = 1 and PTx (transmitted power) =7.78 dBm. LGeo can be calculated as:
upload_2019-1-6_16-44-0.png

upload_2019-1-6_16-44-21.png

where d2R (receiver diameter) = 0.07, l=1, θ (divergence angle) =0.05 and Nr (number of receiver) =1.

The problem is, I got received power=10.72 dBm which is illogical value. As I know, the received power must be lower than transmitted power.
I hope that anyone may help me to understand this situation.
For your information, I refer this paper for the calculation: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6015903
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-6_16-35-28.png
    upload_2019-1-6_16-35-28.png
    898 bytes · Views: 715
  • upload_2019-1-6_16-36-9.png
    upload_2019-1-6_16-36-9.png
    1 KB · Views: 738
  • upload_2019-1-6_16-36-56.png
    upload_2019-1-6_16-36-56.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 381
  • upload_2019-1-6_16-44-0.png
    upload_2019-1-6_16-44-0.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 532
  • upload_2019-1-6_16-44-21.png
    upload_2019-1-6_16-44-21.png
    1 KB · Views: 493
Science news on Phys.org
You have above the θl<d2R, which is outside of the formula applicability range.
Your beam is not illuminating the entire receiver area, therefore the error.
 
  • Like
Likes tech99
trurle said:
You have above the θl<d2R, which is outside of the formula applicability range.
Your beam is not illuminating the entire receiver area, therefore the error.
What is the applicable range?
 
Nur Ziadah said:
What is the applicable range?
Range (all values) of input variables producing a valid output.
 
You mean that θl must greater than d2R in order to produce a valid output?
 
  • Like
Likes tech99 and trurle
trurle said:
You have above the θl<d2R, which is outside of the formula applicability range.
Your beam is not illuminating the entire receiver area, therefore the error.
I am find that optical engineers seem to re-invent the wheel all the time; we have the simple Friis formula for microwave. This uses Ptx, Prx, antenna gains and path loss. The method used above seems very unclear to me. But I am impressed that you noticed that we do not have far field conditions.
 
Back
Top