Recharge an RV battery by hand cranking a generator

  • Automotive
  • Thread starter grandpa2390
  • Start date
  • Featured
  • #1
474
14
If you've seen breaking bad you probably already know what I'm asking.
in this episode I'm watching, they are hand cranking the generator to recharge the battery. They are moving nowheres near as fast as the motor would have spun it. My dad had a hand crank device that was, more or less, a toy. so I'm sure they were producing some electricity.

is this artistic license, or is recharging the rv battery enough to start it, by hand cranking the generator, a realistic ambition? How much voltage, wattage, amperage, or whatever could they expect to produce and how long would it take to get that battery charged enough.

just in general. Assuming spherical cows making whatever assumptions you need to make (consistent turning and so forth). How would this be calculated?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
62,539
13,343
With an efficient bicycle crank setup (like an exercise bike), you will be hard pressed to generate 100W for more than a few minutes. Accomplished cyclists can generate 100W-200W for a while, but it takes training to do that.

So how long will it take you to recharge a car battery with a 100W source?
 
  • #3
phyzguy
Science Advisor
5,012
1,995
With an efficient bicycle crank setup (like an exercise bike), you will be hard pressed to generate 100W for more than a few minutes. Accomplished cyclists can generate 100W-200W for a while, but it takes training to do that.
So how long will it take you to recharge a car battery with a 100W source?
Also, your arms are much less powerful than your legs. So I doubt if a hand cranked generator can exceed 25-50 watts.
 
  • #4
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
Perhaps look up some claims from jump starter battery makers about how many starts you can get per charge, then calculate how many joules that is, then how long it takes to crank.
 
  • #5
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
I second the guess that 25 watts is a lot for a setup like that. But let's use that number. 25 watts is about 2 amps on a 12 V battery. That's exactly what a trickle charger puts out, 1-2 amps.

If you have a 100 AH start battery that it too low to crank, it must be down by 50% or more. To get it to crank for even one revolution, I'm guessing that it needs 60-70% charge. So you need 10-20 AH from the trickle charger. That's about 5-10 hours at max effort. That's crazy, but not not impossibly crazy considering only energy.

But what about RPM? What RPM can you get by cranking compared to normal running speed of the gasoline engine? If the RPM is too low, you won't get any current at all into the battery.

If it was even remotely possible, I suspect that Mythbusters would have put it on the show. They did other Breaking Bad stunts.
 
  • #6
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
If you have a 100 AH start battery that it too low to crank, it must be down by 50% or more. To get it to crank for even one revolution, I'm guessing that it needs 60-70% charge. So you need 10-20 AH from the trickle charger.
I think that's an order of magnitude or two too high (cause: you used the same criteria to pick all 3 numbers). If you think in terms of starter draw, that would be 12,000-24,000A for 3 seconds to start a car.
 
  • #7
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
I think that's an order of magnitude or two too high (cause: you used the same criteria to pick all 3 numbers). If you think in terms of starter draw, that would be 12,000-24,000A for 3 seconds to start a car.

Everything is nonlinear, so an order of magnitude error is certainly possible.

You can crank a car with a little motorcycle battery, but RVs use very large batteries. That's why I said 100 AH battery.

It is certainly true that with a well charged battery, that you can start your engine with 0.5 seconds cranking at 100 amps. That is 0.15 AH. A simplistic analytics says that a 100 AH battery should start you car more than 700 times without any recharging. It won't.

But if your battery is so low that it won't crank at all, it must be down to 10 or 11 volts. That's severe. (The last time I did that, was 50 years ago and the temperature was -40). I'm also not sure how low the voltage has to be before the engine won't turn over. That's an automotive question.

50% of 100 AH is 50 AH.. 50/0.15 is more than 350 times as many AH as should be needed; yet the battery is so low that it won't crank at all.
My point is that the nonlinearities in this case are so severe, that we can't do much by just comparing mechical and electrical energies.
 
  • #8
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
Everything is nonlinear, so an order of magnitude error is certainly possible.

You can crank a car with a little motorcycle battery, but RVs use very large batteries. That's why I said 100 AH battery.

It is certainly true that with a well charged battery, that you can start your engine with 0.5 seconds cranking at 100 amps. That is 0.15 AH. A simplistic analytics says that a 100 AH battery should start you car more than 700 times without any recharging. It won't.

But if your battery is so low that it won't crank at all, it must be down to 10 or 11 volts. That's severe. (The last time I did that, was 50 years ago and the temperature was -40). I'm also not sure how low the voltage has to be before the engine won't turn over. That's an automotive question.

50% of 100 AH is 50 AH.. 50/0.15 is more than 350 times as many AH as should be needed; yet the battery is so low that it won't crank at all.
I get 0.014 AH from 0.5s at 100A. Regardless, how is a car battery rated to make it possible that it won't crank at all at 50% capacity? That doesn't make sense to me.
This link says that capacity is measured at a steady 25A discharge down to 10.5V: https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_measure_capacity

Is the voltage linear with capacity? If so, and 10.5 is defined as "dead", and 13.6V is full, then 11V would be 16% charge.

In any case, I have a version of this jumper battery (don't buy it, it loses 1V per month so you have to recharge it every month or 2:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B073VZ9H7Q/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It says with 500A "Peak" and 250A "Starting" it can start a V8. If we assume a flat 250A for 3 seconds at a nominal voltage of 12.5, that's 9,375 J or 0.2 AH. At 20W, it would take about 8 minutes to build up enough charge cranking by hand.

The x-factor would be exactly how dead the battery is and how much you lose with the first failed starting attempt. If it's really really dead, it would take a certain amount of charging just to achieve "dead".
 
  • #9
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
We need some automotive help on this thread, so I moved it.
'
If your car battery is so dead that it won't crank at all, how long does it take on a trickle charger (1-2 amps) to when it will start your car?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,541
2,314
I think cars take 200-300A for a few seconds. Lets say 3 seconds at 250A. At 12V that would be around 9000 Joules.

If the generation and charging process was 100% efficient that would require 25W for 9000/25 = 360 seconds = 6 mins of cranking. Perhaps double or triple that for losses or errors in assumptions?
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189 and russ_watters
  • #11
phyzguy
Science Advisor
5,012
1,995
I think cars take 200-300A for a few seconds. Lets say 3 seconds at 250A. At 12V that would be around 9000 Joules.

If the generation and charging process was 100% efficient that would require 25W for 9000/25 = 360 seconds = 6 mins of cranking. Perhaps double or triple that for losses or errors in assumptions?

I don't think this answers anorlunda's question. My experience has been, as anorlunda said, that when your battery is too dead to crank, it takes 12-24 hours on a 1-2A trickle charger to get it to the point where it will crank. It's just not as simple as assuming that whatever energy you put into the battery is immediately accessible at whatever voltage and current you want.
 
  • #12
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
One of the nonlinear complications is that as lead-acid batteries severely discharge, the plates become coated with lead sulphate. The operational significance is that the apparent internal resistance of a sulphated battery increases dramatically. At high current draws, such as starting, that causes large transient drops in terminal voltage.

To recover the battery, the lead sulphate must be dissolved. It is more of a chemical problem than an electrical problem. Watts and joules are not helpful to describe this problem.
 
  • #13
Rive
Science Advisor
2,208
1,609
3 seconds at 250A. At 12V that would be around 9000 Joules.
As I recall at that current it'll be around 9-10V. (That only means that ~ third of that 9kJ energy would be spent on heating up the battery, nothing more, nothing less.)

Regarding the original question: it would require quite an effort to spin up the engine (by hand) for the minimal RPM where the generator would start providing noticeable charge current:woot:

Charging is not expected to happen (much) below the idle RPM of the engine.
I did not see the mentioned series/episode but let's say... According what was written here this idea is on par with the average MacGyver stuff:smile:
 
  • #14
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,541
2,314
Oh were they hand cranking the whole engine to get the alternator to spin? I never watched the film. If that's the case I think you can write it off immediately as impossible.
 
  • #15
berkeman
Mentor
62,539
13,343
Oh were they hand cranking the whole engine to get the alternator to spin? I never watched the film. If that's the case I think you can write it off immediately as impossible.
Let's not be so hasty! I hand cranked my first car every day to drive to school (driving uphill both ways, BTW)...

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DArvPMlxHeQ/hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

After I earned some money mowing lawns by hand, I bought my first airplane for commuting...

https://cdn.avweb.com/media/newspics/325/p19hj394ra17k710ullcg13kj135k7.jpg

p19hj394ra17k710ullcg13kj135k7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • hqdefault.jpg
    hqdefault.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 1,273
  • p19hj394ra17k710ullcg13kj135k7.jpg
    p19hj394ra17k710ullcg13kj135k7.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 1,439
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney and russ_watters
  • #16
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,541
2,314
But hopefully you only held onto the prop for quarter of a turn :-)
 
  • #17
gmax137
Science Advisor
2,123
1,663
leverage

cafe-racer-kick.jpg
 

Attachments

  • cafe-racer-kick.jpg
    cafe-racer-kick.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 1,233
  • #18
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,261
5,954
Let's not be so hasty! I hand cranked my first car every day to drive to school (driving uphill both ways, BTW)...
That point has been ignored up until now.
It interests me that you used to live in Esher Land ; uphill both ways. :wink:
 
  • #19
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
10,541
2,314
When I was a university student the Pub was always down hill bothways from our accomodation. At least it always felt like it was down hill as we cycled back afterwards.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, sophiecentaur and berkeman
  • #20
474
14
With an efficient bicycle crank setup (like an exercise bike), you will be hard pressed to generate 100W for more than a few minutes. Accomplished cyclists can generate 100W-200W for a while, but it takes training to do that.

So how long will it take you to recharge a car battery with a 100W source?

I found one site that said the average car requires 480 watts to start. so 5 hours for the average car?
 
  • #21
berkeman
Mentor
62,539
13,343
I found one site that said the average car requires 480 watts to start. so 5 hours for the average car?
Units, units, units...
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #22
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,261
5,954
I found one site that said the average car requires 480 watts to start. so 5 hours for the average car?
That's only 40A and your average starter motor takes a few hundred Amps when the engine is cold and hasn't been running for some while. I could believe 40A to re-start a stalled engine at traffic lights, though.
But it's not just the Power needed. It's the Energy (Watt Hours) or, alternatively, the Charge (Amp Hours) that counts. Having coaxed many a tired old engine into life with a tired old battery, I know that the engine can be turned over once with no result but two or three times can kick it into life. Getting enough Energy to start once is only half of the job because there are other demands on the battery - if only the leakage in an ageing one. You'd need to be talking in terms of several tens of AHr for a useful charge.
A great advantage of hand cranking is that there are no losses due to charging and discharging a battery and your input is 'direct'. A peak mechanical input of several hundred Watts would be possible for a second or two, using the body mass intelligently, could be expected. But not for an old gimmer like me!!
 
  • #23
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
That's only 40A and your average starter motor takes a few hundred Amps when the engine is cold and hasn't been running for some while.
I was thinking it might have been an average; starting at a few hundred, then dropping as the torque decreases and it gets up to speed.
 
  • #24
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,261
5,954
I was thinking it might have been an average; starting at a few hundred, then dropping as the torque decreases and it gets up to speed.
That effect does tend to happen. Thing is, topping up the battery manually could perhaps be significant as long as the battery is in good fettle because the total Energy for starting is not all that high - something like a few kJ. I have managed to start an old diesel marine engine by hand but that was only in desperation and involved releasing the compression and getting the flywheel spinning first. The engine was a tiddler (1300cc), compared with an RV and used to start well enough when the battery could turn it over fast, a couple of times.
I reckon the OP would be better advised to look into PV systems. Cheap and off the shelf and supplying an Amp or so (effortlessly), all day. Someone else has done the design work there, which gets my vote. :smile:
 
  • #25
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
The OP refers to a TV episode. Here's a still picture of the scenario from that episode.
breaking-bad-season-2-episode-91.jpg


To answer the OP, at least three related topics must be considered.
  1. How much energy at what rate (power) does it take to start a RV gasoline engine?
  2. How much electric energy at what rate can you expect to produce pulling on the start cord of a portable generator?
  3. What does it take to recover a depleted lead-acid battery enough to meet the requirement of #1?
The consensus on #2 seems to be zero. That makes #1 and #3 moot.
 

Attachments

  • breaking-bad-season-2-episode-91.jpg
    breaking-bad-season-2-episode-91.jpg
    129.2 KB · Views: 818
  • #26
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
2. How much electric energy at what rate can you expect to produce pulling on the start cord of a portable generator?

The consensus on #2 seems to be zero. That makes #1 and #3 moot.
Consensus from where? I don't remember seeing discussion of that.

Googling the scenario though, I'm seeing it discussed that a certain rpm is required to generate the needed voltage, so no charging would happen. I'm not an EE, but if that's the case it would be a dealbreaker.
 
  • #27
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
Consensus from where? I don't remember seeing discussion of that.

Googling the scenario though, I'm seeing it discussed that a certain rpm is required to generate the needed voltage, so no charging would happen. I'm not an EE, but if that's the case it would be a dealbreaker.

Yup, that was mentioned in #5, #13. Nobody that I see offered a counter-opinion.
 
  • #28
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
Yup, that was mentioned in #5, #13. Nobody that I see offered a counter-opinion.
Oh, I was reading "pulling on the start cord" literally. You meant cranking on the generator? To be honest, since the statements didn't contain an explanation, I wasn't sure what they meant. It sounds like maybe the same thing as what I just said...

...though literally "pulling on a start cord" instead of cranking might overcome the minimum rpm issue.
 
  • #29
Rive
Science Advisor
2,208
1,609
Here's a still picture of the scenario from that episode.
Very thanks!

According to the picture the correct term to look up would be something like 'petrol battery charger'. As I know these are optimized for stable RPM around the maximal efficiency point of the engine. And that's usually somewhere between 2000-4000RPM. It happens that for a generator that's a quite convenient RPM, so they are usually in sync with the engine - they cannot be disconnected.
I don't know how the regulator works, but I doubt anything would come out below 1000RPM.

What RPM would be possible by hand (let' say there is no compression)?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #30
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
10,513
7,761
The OP said:
in this episode I'm watching, they are hand cranking the generator to recharge the battery.
To me, that means the same as pulling on the start cord.

Portable generators have the same recoil start mechanism as a lawn mower. If you repeatedly pull the start cord on your lawn mower with the kill switch on (so it doesn't start), what average RPM do you think you could maintain?

@Rive had the best engineering comment; coupling it to the idle speed of the engine.
Charging is not expected to happen (much) below the idle RPM of the engine.

If we applied load at idle speed, the engine would likely stall. The portable generator designers would have to make sure it doesn't stall. They could do that electrically, or mechanically with a centrifugal clutch between engine and generator, set to engage as some RPM higher than idle speed. It is the same in a manual transmission car; you have to run it slightly faster than idle speed before letting out the clutch.
 
  • #31
dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,325
2,614
After I earned some money mowing lawns by hand, ...
I think I've seen your mower somewhere? :olduhh:

motorcyclelawnmower.jpg
 

Attachments

  • motorcyclelawnmower.jpg
    motorcyclelawnmower.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 626
  • #33
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
What RPM would be possible by hand (let' say there is no compression)?
No more than about 120rpm before torque drops off rapidly. Optimal is around 90-110.
 
  • #34
russ_watters
Mentor
21,506
8,546
To me, that means the same as pulling on the start cord.

Portable generators have the same recoil start mechanism as a lawn mower. If you repeatedly pull the start cord on your lawn mower with the kill switch on (so it doesn't start), what average RPM do you think you could maintain?
If there's a threshold rpm above which you are generating enough voltage to charge and below which you aren't, using the average rpm would give the wrong answer. For example you might calculate the average never exceeds the threshold when in reality you exceed it half the time and are therefore be charging half the time. I don't want to dwell on this though, since it isn't the OP's scenario and would be horribly inefficient physiologically: most people couldn't do it for more than a minute.

To sum up though:
1. Physiologically, a human is capable of putting out enough energy in a reasonable time to start an engine.

but:

2. The particular scenario doesn't work because they aren't spinning the alternator at its required rpm to generate enough voltage to charge the battery.

Incidentally, there are commercial products for exactly this purpose:
https://www.k-tor.com/pedal-powered-generator/

That's rated for 3A at 14V. Thinking about this I remembered that in some yachting races they take the human and wind power thing to the extreme where all their sophisticated electronics are human powered; when they aren't trimming sails, crewmen are charging batteries.
 
  • #35
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,261
5,954
There is a vast difference between starting an engine manually and charging the vehicle battery. The picture that's way up the thread of an aeroplane being started by hand is an example of what you can do with a single compression. Aero engines of that sort have fancy magnetos that produce a really meaty spark (Modern electronic ignition will do the same for you) and the engine is very high compression for work at altitude. There are stories of aero engines starting when someone leans on the prop, when it's been primed and at the right point in the cycle. (They chop off arms apparently- or so a pilot was telling me when we were standing near the prop and chatting.) Wartime engines were started using a blank rifle cartridge - a one off impulse.
But an RV engine is not an aero engine and the OP was basically about a bit of poetic licence in a film.
 

Related Threads on Recharge an RV battery by hand cranking a generator

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
H
Replies
7
Views
2K
Top