Recirculating DE Mixture Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter The0wn4g3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a rigid tank with saltwater and the dynamics of concentration changes due to inflow and outflow rates. The initial attempt at solving the differential equation for concentration change was flawed, as it did not account for the tank's volume. The corrected equation includes the volume in the outflow calculation, leading to a more accurate representation of concentration dynamics. After applying randomly chosen values, the results appear reasonable, prompting the user to seek validation of their solution. The conversation highlights the importance of incorporating all relevant factors in differential equations for accurate modeling.
The0wn4g3
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rigid tank of volume "V" contains salt dissolved in water at a concentration "C". Fresh water flows into the tank at a rate of "F". A fraction "x" of the exit flow is recirculated back into the entrance flow.

Given:
V, Volume of tank
Fin, Flow rate in
Fo, Flow rate out
x, Fraction of volume flow-rate recirculated
Co, Initial concentration
C(t), Concentration in tank at time t

img002.jpg


Homework Equations



\frac{dC}{dt}=\text{concentration of salt entering}-\text{concentration of salt leaving}

C_{in}=xFC(t)

C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)

so \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

When I plot this using Euler's Method, I get this graph. This is obviously incorrect, because it does not reflect exponential decay. Can someone help me out? I'm really not sure what I've done wrong.
untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may have found my own mistake. I totally forgot to take into account to volume of the tank. I believe this wound change the Flow Out equation to:

<br /> C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)<br />

so the final equation would be:

<br /> \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-\frac{(1-x)FC(t)}{V}<br />

is this correct?

With some randomly chosen values (V=10,000 ft^3/s F=10 ft^3 x=.2 Co=.8) I get this, which seems much more reasonable.

untitled-1.jpg
 
Anyone want to qualify my answer here? Should I re-post this somewhere else? Hello?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top