Recommendations for good book which teaches math fundamentals

  • Thread starter Thread starter abdul rehman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Fundamentals
AI Thread Summary
For a high school student seeking a deeper understanding of mathematical fundamentals, "Calculus I" by Stewart is recommended for its intuitive approach without heavy emphasis on proofs. Alternatively, if the student prefers a proof-based perspective, "Calculus" by Michael Spivak is suggested. Both books aim to clarify concepts behind differentiation and integration, addressing the theoretical gaps often found in standard textbooks. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles of mathematics rather than just performing exercises. These recommendations cater to different learning preferences while focusing on foundational concepts.
abdul rehman
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
can you suggest a book which teaches fundamentals and basis of fuandamental of mathematics
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do YOU mean by "fundamentals of mathematics". Set theory, logic, etc.?
 
soryy for being vague but i mean i am i high school student in our textbooks we get exercices to do but there is a lack of theory for example i can do high school level differetiation and integration problems but i don't know what actually it means. can anybody recommend any book which can explain some basics
 
abdul rehman said:
soryy for being vague but i mean i am i high school student in our textbooks we get exercices to do but there is a lack of theory for example i can do high school level differetiation and integration problems but i don't know what actually it means. can anybody recommend any book which can explain some basics

Well, if you don't want to get into proofs but rather have a more intuitive understanding of phenomena then Calculus I by Stewart would work. But if you like proofs than Spivak would work as well.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
233
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Back
Top