Rectangular Plate SHM Time Period

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
37 replies · 6K views
There will be an unbalanced torque (counterclockwise) about the CM .Just as the plate rotates,the tension T2 goes to zero , ie. String 2 becomes slack .

Right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. There will be a "critical angle" θc such that T2 = 0 when θ = θc. The net torque about the CM will still be zero at this angle. But once θ > θc, string 2 will have become slack and there will be a nonzero CCW torque about the CM due to T1. Then the plate rotates and the motion is more complicated.

You can see that if the plate were narrow horizontally and long vertically, then θc would be very small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the insight .

Does finding the center of the circle require a bit of guesswork on our part ?

I first thought of the blue dot as the center .Found the coordinates with ehild's guidance.Then manipulated the coordinates by shifting the origin from the blue dot.

Was there a more systematic way to think about the center of the arc ?
 
The blue dot was the origin of the coordinate system. with respect to it, the coordinates of the CM were [Lsinθ , -(Lcosθ+a/2)]. That is, the X coordinate is X=Lsinθ, the y coordinate is Y=-Lcosθ-a/2: Lsinθ=X, -Lcosθ=Y+a/2. Square both equations and add them:

X2+(Y+a/2)2=L2.

You got the equation of the circle the CM moves along. The centre is (0;-a/2). The radius is L. What was the guesswork?

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The radius of the arc of the CM must equal the radius of the arc of the point of attachment of one of the strings to the plate. Thus, the radius of the arc of the CM must be the same as the length of the string.

Recall from post #24:
If the plate doesn't rotate, then it must move in pure translation. Thus the trajectories of any two points of the plate are congruent.
 
ehild said:
The blue dot was the origin of the coordinate system. with respect to it, the coordinates of the CM were [Lsinθ , -(Lcosθ+a/2)]. That is, the X coordinate is X=Lsinθ, the y coordinate is Y=-Lcosθ-a/2: Lsinθ=X, -Lcosθ=Y+a/2. Square both equations and add them:

X2+(Y+a/2)2=L2.

You got the equation of the circle the CM moves along. The centre is (0;-a/2). The radius is L. What was the guesswork?

ehild

Nice and simple. Thanks!

I didn't find the center ,the way you did . When I looked at the coordinates ,it struck to me that if I could shift the origin to (0,-a/2) ,that will do the trick .

That is the guesswork I was talking about .
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
The radius of the arc of the CM must equal the radius of the arc of the point of attachment of one of the strings to the plate. Thus, the radius of the arc of the CM must be the same as the length of the string.

Nice!

Thank you very very much TSny and ehild .You both have been simply wonderful :smile:
 
Intuition is very important, and you have that ability. But it should be checked and proved by systematic work, which might not be that nice.

I followed the method applied in high-school problems. 'Prove that something is a circle and find the centre and radius'.
TSny-s method is more intuitive and physical : The plate only translates - all its points move along the same curve , the point of any attachment with a string has to move along a circle of radius L, so does the CM.

ehild