- #1
poochie_d
- 18
- 0
Hi all, just joined PF; I have a question about Munkres's Topology (2ed), Section 9 #7(c):
Find a sequence [itex]A_1, A_2, \ldots[/itex] of infinite sets, such that for each [itex]n \in \mathbb{Z_+}[/itex], the set [itex]A_{n+1}[/itex] has greater cardinality than [itex]A_n[/itex].
Definition: If A and B are sets, then A has greater cardinality than B if there is an injection of B into A, but no injection of A into B.
Principle of recursive definition (from Munkres):
Let C be a set, with c in C. Let [itex] \mathcal{F} [/itex] = {set of functions f : {1,...,n} [itex] \rightarrow [/itex] C}.
Let [itex] \rho [/itex] be a map from [itex] \mathcal{F} [/itex] to C.
Then there exists a unique function h : [itex] \mathbb{Z_+} \rightarrow [/itex] C such that
h(1) = c, h(n) = [itex] \rho [/itex](h|{1,...,n-1}) for n > 1.
Define recursively, as follows:
[tex] A_1 = \mathbb{R}, \quad A_n = \mathcal{P}(A_{n-1}) [/tex] for n > 1,
where [itex] \mathcal{P}(B) [/itex] denotes the power set of [itex]B[/itex].
Since there is no injection from [itex]\mathcal{P}(B)[/itex] to [itex]B[/itex] for any set [itex]B[/itex] (this is a theorem from Munkres), and we can always define the injective map [itex] f : B \rightarrow \mathcal{P}(B), \quad f(b) = \{b\} [/itex], it follows that [itex]A_{n+1}[/itex] has greater cardinality than [itex]A_n[/itex] for all n.
I suppose this solution is "correct", but is there a more formal way to define the recursive step, using the above Principle from Munkres? I mean, how would you define the function [itex]\rho[/itex]? I think it should probably be something like:
[itex] \rho : \mathcal{F} \rightarrow C, \quad \rho(f) = \mathcal{P}(f(n)) [/itex] for [itex] f : \{1,\ldots,n\} \rightarrow C [/itex],
but I don't know how to define the set [itex]C[/itex] ...
Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Homework Statement
Find a sequence [itex]A_1, A_2, \ldots[/itex] of infinite sets, such that for each [itex]n \in \mathbb{Z_+}[/itex], the set [itex]A_{n+1}[/itex] has greater cardinality than [itex]A_n[/itex].
Homework Equations
Definition: If A and B are sets, then A has greater cardinality than B if there is an injection of B into A, but no injection of A into B.
Principle of recursive definition (from Munkres):
Let C be a set, with c in C. Let [itex] \mathcal{F} [/itex] = {set of functions f : {1,...,n} [itex] \rightarrow [/itex] C}.
Let [itex] \rho [/itex] be a map from [itex] \mathcal{F} [/itex] to C.
Then there exists a unique function h : [itex] \mathbb{Z_+} \rightarrow [/itex] C such that
h(1) = c, h(n) = [itex] \rho [/itex](h|{1,...,n-1}) for n > 1.
The Attempt at a Solution
Define recursively, as follows:
[tex] A_1 = \mathbb{R}, \quad A_n = \mathcal{P}(A_{n-1}) [/tex] for n > 1,
where [itex] \mathcal{P}(B) [/itex] denotes the power set of [itex]B[/itex].
Since there is no injection from [itex]\mathcal{P}(B)[/itex] to [itex]B[/itex] for any set [itex]B[/itex] (this is a theorem from Munkres), and we can always define the injective map [itex] f : B \rightarrow \mathcal{P}(B), \quad f(b) = \{b\} [/itex], it follows that [itex]A_{n+1}[/itex] has greater cardinality than [itex]A_n[/itex] for all n.
I suppose this solution is "correct", but is there a more formal way to define the recursive step, using the above Principle from Munkres? I mean, how would you define the function [itex]\rho[/itex]? I think it should probably be something like:
[itex] \rho : \mathcal{F} \rightarrow C, \quad \rho(f) = \mathcal{P}(f(n)) [/itex] for [itex] f : \{1,\ldots,n\} \rightarrow C [/itex],
but I don't know how to define the set [itex]C[/itex] ...
Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!