Redox for covalently bonded species?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of the redox convention in reactions involving covalently bonded species, with some participants questioning its relevance. One viewpoint suggests that redox concepts are more applicable to metals, where electron transfer is clear, while reactions among covalent compounds may not always involve changes in oxidation states. It is argued that many reactions can occur without altering oxidation numbers, indicating that redox processes may not be essential for understanding these reactions. However, others counter that significant changes in oxidation states can and do occur in covalent compounds, particularly in organic chemistry, where oxidation and reduction can be defined through changes in carbon's oxidation state. The conversation highlights a divide between traditional redox interpretations and the complexities of covalent reactions, suggesting that while redox numbers can aid understanding, their application may not always be straightforward in covalent contexts.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.

I think using the redox convention involving metals is very natural as electons are easily seen to be transferred.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Redox #'s are used simply as a method to have a handle on where electrons are moving. It is just something people invented to make their understanding of certain reactions easier.
 
pivoxa15 said:
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.
What gives you the impression that there is no change in oxidation state when covalent species react? In fact, I'd venture that most changes in oxidation state are seen in fairly covalent compounds.
 
Gokul43201 said:
What gives you the impression that there is no change in oxidation state when covalent species react? In fact, I'd venture that most changes in oxidation state are seen in fairly covalent compounds.

I said some reactions between covalent species dosen't involve a change in oxidation states, not all.

I don't see the importance of keeping oxidation numbers for colvalent bonded species. When two covalently bonded species react, what is the point of knowing which is the reductance and oxidant? These species will always 'think' they have valence shell filled. However with metals, a change in oxidation number reflects a change in the number of its valence shell electrons.
 
pivoxa15 said:
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.

I think using the redox convention involving metals is very natural as electons are easily seen to be transferred.

The "oxidation" and "reduction" may not be identical in definition with respect to organic compounds and actual redox reactions. Organic compounds can be oxidized or reduced; the carbon that is oxidized for instance, the secondary alcohol carbon to the carbonyl carbon of a ketone, is going to have an altered oxidation state as a result. You may or may not have been taught how to derive the numerical value for this concept on a particular atom in an organic compound but it isn't essentially equivalent to the formal charge.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top