Redox Reactions: Why Doesn't 1 M NaOH Spontaneously Reduce Hydronium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions Redox
AI Thread Summary
1 M NaOH does not spontaneously reduce hydronium ions due to the oxidation state of sodium in the compound, which is Na+ and not metallic sodium (Na). While sodium is a strong reducing agent in its elemental form, in NaOH, it is already oxidized and cannot participate in reduction reactions. The discussion highlights confusion about the nature of reduction and the conditions under which certain substances can act as reducers. The distinction between metallic sodium and its ionic form is crucial for understanding redox reactions. Overall, the inability of 1 M NaOH to reduce hydronium ions stems from the oxidation state of sodium in the compound.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Which of the following does not spontaneously reduce 1 M hydronium ion?

Homework Equations



Spontaneous reduction: + E-zero value.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 1 M NaOH. However, sodium is a very strong reducer. Why doesn't this reaction go spontaneously?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And what are "the following", which you have not listed?

While sodium is a strong reducer, kitchen salt doesn't reduce my meals. Calcium is a strong reducer too, but despite being present in my bones, it doesn't reduce me to... something reduced. Can you think why?
 
I really have no clue. I've been looking at redox for the past twelve hours. An explanation would b highly appreciated!
 
But you do know the difference between metallic sodium (Na) and oxidized sodium (Na+) in a compound?
 
Last edited:
Oh ... Ones not a good reducer
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top