Redshift & Far Distant Stars: Effects on Temperature

Click For Summary
Redshift from distant stars leads to decreased heat, suggesting a lower equilibrium temperature than average stars, which relates to the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). The CMB is not from stars but from the surface of last scattering, supporting the Big Bang theory. Olber's paradox highlights the contrast between a static, infinite universe, which would be brightly lit, and our observed dark night sky, reinforcing the expanding universe model. The paradox indicates that a steady-state universe would not match our observations, as redshift is not applicable in such a model. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the implications of redshift and Olber's paradox in understanding the universe's structure and origins.
samsara15
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. That logic led to the discovery of the CMB...though it isn't stars that is seen in the CMB, but the surface of last scattering.

Doesn't help much with Obler's paradox though.
 
Actually it does help.
Obler's paradox refers to a night sky that would be illuminated if the universe was static and infinite, in contrast with what we do see, a black night sky. A static universe would not have the observed Redshift ( capitalized as in the question ), so a black might sky is used as evidence in support of the big bang theory, expanding universe, along with the CMB and its redshift.
 
samsara15 said:
Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?

The Olber Paradox doesn't refer to a Universe where red shift is relevant -in any case, to deal with your red shift point, in a stead state Universe, surely there would be as many stars approaching us as receding.

The Olber paradox has done its job, you could say, in that it has shown that a steady state, infinite Universe would not appear like our Universe does.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K