Redshift & Far Distant Stars: Effects on Temperature

AI Thread Summary
Redshift from distant stars leads to decreased heat, suggesting a lower equilibrium temperature than average stars, which relates to the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). The CMB is not from stars but from the surface of last scattering, supporting the Big Bang theory. Olber's paradox highlights the contrast between a static, infinite universe, which would be brightly lit, and our observed dark night sky, reinforcing the expanding universe model. The paradox indicates that a steady-state universe would not match our observations, as redshift is not applicable in such a model. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the implications of redshift and Olber's paradox in understanding the universe's structure and origins.
samsara15
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. That logic led to the discovery of the CMB...though it isn't stars that is seen in the CMB, but the surface of last scattering.

Doesn't help much with Obler's paradox though.
 
Actually it does help.
Obler's paradox refers to a night sky that would be illuminated if the universe was static and infinite, in contrast with what we do see, a black night sky. A static universe would not have the observed Redshift ( capitalized as in the question ), so a black might sky is used as evidence in support of the big bang theory, expanding universe, along with the CMB and its redshift.
 
samsara15 said:
Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?

The Olber Paradox doesn't refer to a Universe where red shift is relevant -in any case, to deal with your red shift point, in a stead state Universe, surely there would be as many stars approaching us as receding.

The Olber paradox has done its job, you could say, in that it has shown that a steady state, infinite Universe would not appear like our Universe does.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top