Reducing power of alkaline earth metals

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the standard reduction potentials (SRP) of beryllium and magnesium compared to heavier group members, noting that these lighter metals exhibit lower SRP. This phenomenon is attributed to their more negative hydration enthalpies, which seemingly contradicts the expectation that higher hydration enthalpy would favor oxidation. The conversation also highlights lithium as an anomaly within the alkali metals, where its high hydration enthalpy contributes to its strong reducing power, while beryllium and magnesium are similarly affected by high hydration enthalpy but with reduced reducing power. The confusion arises from differing interpretations of hydration enthalpy's role in the reduction potential of these metals.
aim1732
Messages
428
Reaction score
2
Why is standard reduction potential of beryllium and magnesium lower as compared to heavier members of the group while the reverse is true for alkali group? I read somewhere that this is due to more negative hydration enthalpies of these metals but shouldn't it make oxidation of these metals more favoured?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Yes but my question was something else. I read in a book that reducing power of Li is due to its high hydration enthalpy. But somewhere else the authors also attributed the low reduction power of beryllium and magnesium to the same cause - high hydration enthalpy. Any ideas?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top