Reducing Radicals in Exams: Is it True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
With regard to examinations, is it true that radicals must typically be "reduced", if possible?

For instance, with fractions, you would hardly ever leave 4/8 as it is, but instead reduce it to 1/2.

Well let's say that durring an exam, you arrived at \displaystyle{\sqrt[3]{81}} for an answer.

Is it true that normal procedure is to instead express that as \displaystyle{3\sqrt[3]{3}} ?

Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes is the answer. It's just good practice.

Though in the example you've cited expressing the answer as 3^{\frac{4}{3}} doesn't seem wrong to me.
 
Yes, expressing it still in surd form or in power form is generally fine, unless they specifically ask you do express it in some other form.

Though if it is the final step of a question, I would leave it as surd form, simplified, rather than leaving it in a power form, unless there are more calculations to follow, which require indices etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top