Reduction formula, integration problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a reduction formula in the context of integration, specifically focusing on the definite integral of a function involving tangent and secant. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the disappearance of secant squared during the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions how secant squared is eliminated in the integration of tangent. A participant provides a derivative relationship that clarifies the cancellation process. Others acknowledge this explanation and express understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with some participants gaining clarity on the integration process. There is acknowledgment of the explanation provided, but further exploration of the implications of the definite integral and its evaluation remains open.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integral is definite, suggesting that the final result should yield a numerical value or a simplified expression. There is also a mention of a minor point regarding the use of notation in the original poster's expression.

JFonseka
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Part of an example of using reduction formula, I won't post the whole question as I get most of it, just at the very end, magical things happen with the working and things disappear, as they usually do with integration:

The definite integral goes from 0 to pi/4

=>[tex]\int[/tex] tan[tex]^{n-2}[/tex] x sec[tex]^{2}[/tex] x dx
=>tan[tex]^{n-1} x/n -1[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is, what happened to the sec[tex]^{2}[/tex] x in the integration process?
I see the tan got integrated, but I can't figure out how sec disappears
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\tan x = sec^2x[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow dx = \frac{d\left(\tan x\right)}{\sec^2 x}[/tex]
 
Ah...I see, so that's how the sec^2 x gets canceled out.

Thanks hootenanny!
 
JFonseka said:
Ah...I see, so that's how the sec^2 x gets canceled out.

Thanks hootenanny!
A pleasure.
 
Since the integral is a definite integral, you should end up with a number, or at least an expression that doesn't involve n. Your final expression can easily be evaluated at both limits of integration.

As a minor point, you're using an "implies" symbol (==>) incorrectly. The first integral doesn't "imply" the second; it's equal to it.
 
Hootenanny said:
A pleasure.
It probably has been asked before, but what's the English equivalent of your signature line? I think I understand a few of the words.

disce quasi semper victurus vive quasi cras moriturus

speak? almost always of victory? live almost ?? (you?) die

Thanks
 
Mark44 said:
disce quasi semper victurus vive quasi cras moriturus

speak? almost always of victory? live almost ?? (you?) die
I'm impressed! You're quite close to the literal translation, but the meaning is

"Learn as if you were going to live forever, live as if you were going to die tomorrow".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K