Refractive index of materials at rf frequencies to make a smaller wire antenna

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on the refractive index of materials at RF frequencies raises questions about the existence of data tables and methods for estimating refractive indices for TV antennas. The potential for smaller antennas immersed in a medium with a higher refractive index is explored, with concerns about reflection at the boundary between the medium and air impacting reception. The importance of filling the space between the antenna and receiver with the medium to minimize reflection is emphasized. Suggestions include calibrating the antenna for the medium or using electronic hardware to correct for dispersion effects. The shape of the medium's boundary may also play a significant role in optimizing antenna performance.
material
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I would like to ask a few questions. Does a table of refractive indices of materials at rf frequencies (say for TV) exists? Is there a way for me to estimate it for some materials? Are the refractive indices of these materials higher? Will those materials have low absorption losses at these frequencies? Would it be practical and sensible to make a TV antenna of smaller dimensions, and immerse this antenna in the medium? Could this idea work?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm sorry for doing this but I would really like somebody to give an answer to this question. I'm not sure if increasing the refractive index of an antenna's surroundings permits me to tune into a frequency band with an antenna that has smaller dimensions. My thinking is that wavelength is what's important in tuning an antenna and not frequency. Please help.
 
Unless you fill the space between the antenna and the receiver with the medium, the waves will have to exit the medium and enter the air. If the speed of the waves in the medium is significantly different than the speed in air you'll have strong reflection at the interface and the coupling with air will be poor.
This is one problem I may think about.
I don't know where you can find data regarding speed of RF waves in media.
Maybe try a search on Google Scholar.
 
Thank you for your reply. I missed that point about reflection at the boundary between the media.

nasu said:
Unless you fill the space between the antenna and the receiver with the medium, the waves will have to exit the medium and enter the air.

Do you mean the space between the transmitting and receiving antenna or the space between the receiving antenna and the RF receiver? I'm assuming you mean the space between the antennas. I'm more concerned with reception than transmission. Reflection of RF waves at the boundary are a problem. If the antenna is smaller, then I could make a better antenna with more elements because the dime. As for total internal reflection, the reflection due to a traveling wave exceeding the critical angle only occurs from a medium of high refractive index to low refractive index. Some noise issues will occur from RF waves trying to escape the medium.

I'm suggesting this as a possible solution. The antenna should be small enough in size. The medium it is immersed in is larger and is shaped as a sphere. I am imagining that the reflections will occur close to the boundary of the sphere and will avoid interfering with the antenna. The medium selected has a high critical angle at RF frequencies if possible.

As for dispersion, I'm not sure how to deal with this in a simple, practical way. Calibrate the antenna to suit the medium? Add some electronic hardware that corrects for the aberration?

After seeing an article on Wikipedia on Snell's window, in which "Snell's window is a phenomenon by which an underwater viewer sees everything above the surface through a cone of light of width of about 96 degrees," maybe the shape of the medium's boundary and the antenna used is important somehow.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top