I was looking through some tables of Laplace Transforms on f(t) the other day, and I noticed that in all cases, as [tex]s \to \infty[/tex], [tex]F(s) \to 0[/tex]. A question that I have been trying to prove is that if [tex]\lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0[/tex], then does that necessitate whether [tex]F(s)[/tex] can undergo an inverse Laplace transform (i.e. by the Bromwich integral)?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I suspect that the answer is "no", but if anyone has some attempt at a proof I would appreciate it (my idea would be to use Post's inversion formula and utilizing the Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral for evaluating [tex]F^{(k)}\left(\frac{k}{t}\right)[/tex], but so far this has been futile)?

Thanks (and if my question needs any clarification please let me know),

flouran

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Regarding Inverse Laplace Transforms

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**