Regarding Polarizer and viewing sun

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sab95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarizer Sun
AI Thread Summary
When two polarizers are oriented at 90 degrees to each other, they typically block all light, yet some users report still seeing bright sources like the sun. This phenomenon is attributed to the imperfections in polarizers, which can allow a small percentage of light to pass through, known as the extinction ratio. The discussion highlights that polarizers do not effectively reduce infrared (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) light, making it unsafe to view the sun through them. Additionally, the type of polarization—linear or circular—affects how light leakage can be managed. Overall, while polarizers can significantly reduce light, they are not perfect and can still transmit some light, especially from intense sources.
Sab95
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If two polarizers are placed 90 degree rotated to each other, we won't be able to see anything. But when I tried looking directly at sun, which I did only for a second, with that perpendicular pair of polarizers, I was still able to see the sun.
Shouldn't the sun disappear too ? Or why is it am able to see the sun ? Similarly it's applicable when I look at a strong source of light, like tube light or CFL bulbs.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
I expect that the polarizers are not perfect and let some small amount of light through.
 
Sab95 said:
If two polarizers are placed 90 degree rotated to each other, we won't be able to see anything. But when I tried looking directly at sun, which I did only for a second, with that perpendicular pair of polarizers, I was still able to see the sun.
Shouldn't the sun disappear too ? Or why is it am able to see the sun ? Similarly it's applicable when I look at a strong source of light, like tube light or CFL bulbs.
I think it is just imperfection in the polarisers. They seem to vary in quality, because those I have here will block ordinary light bulbs. To obtain the very high re
Drakkith said:
I expect that the polarizers are not perfect and let some small amount of light through.
First of all, may I mention that it is unsafe to look at the Sun through the polarisers because they do not reduce IR to a safe level.
Regarding being able to see the Sun through them, polarisers are not perfect. I have found examples on the Net with "extinction ratio" from 0.5% to 0.005%. It is interesting to consider the nature of the small leakage. If it is linearly polarised, it will be possible to remove it by rotating the polariser very slightly. But if it is circularly polarised, then it will not be possible to remove it by rotation. This situation will happen if the film causes different phase shifts for the two linear polarisations.
 
tech99 said:
<snip>First of all, may I mention that it is unsafe to look at the Sun through the polarisers because they do not reduce IR to a safe level. <snip>

Excellent point- and UV light, as well.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top