MHB Related Rates: Conical Pile of Sand | Vampire_thirst Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Another related rates problem?


Sand falls from a conveyor belt at a rate of 30 m^3/min onto the top of a conical pile. The height of the pile is always the same as the base diameter. Answer the following.

a.) How fast is the height changing when the pile is 8 m high?
Answer = m/min.

b.) How fast is the radius changing when the pile is 8 m high?
Answer = m/min.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello vampire_thirst,

The statement:

"Sand falls from a conveyor belt at a rate of 30 m^3/min..."

tells us regarding the rate of change of the volume of the pile of sand:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}}$$

That is, the volume of the pile is increasing at a rate of 30 cubic meters per minute.

The statement:

"The height of the pile is always the same as the base diameter"

tells us:

$$h=2r$$

And so, using the formula for the volume of a cone:

$$V=\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2h$$

we find:

(1) The volume as a function of the height $h$:

$$V(h)=\frac{1}{3}\pi \left(\frac{h}{2} \right)^2(h)=\frac{1}{12}\pi h^3$$

(2) The volume as a function of the base radius $r$:

$$V(r)=\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2(2r)=\frac{2}{3}\pi r^3$$

a.) How fast is the height changing when the pile is 8 m high?

If we implicitly differentiate (1) with respect to time $t$, we obtain:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{1}{4}\pi h^2\frac{dh}{dt}$$

Since we are asked to find how fast the height of the pile is increasing, we want to solve for $$\frac{dh}{dt}$$:

$$\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{4}{\pi h^2}\frac{dV}{dt}$$

Now, using the given data:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}},\,h=8\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{4}{\pi \left(8\text{ m} \right)^2}\left(30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}} \right)=\frac{15}{8\pi}\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}\approx0.596831036594608\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

b.) How fast is the radius changing when the pile is 8 m high?

If we implicitly differentiate (2) with respect to time $t$, we obtain:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=2\pi r^2\frac{dr}{dt}$$

Since we are asked to find how fast the base radius of the pile is increasing, we want to solve for $$\frac{dr}{dt}$$:

$$\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{1}{2\pi r^2}\frac{dV}{dt}$$

Now, using the given data:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}},\,r=4\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{1}{2\pi \left(4\text{ m} \right)^2}\left(30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}} \right)=\frac{15}{16\pi}\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}\approx0.298415518297304\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top