Relation Between Computers, Light and Pi

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between computers, the speed of light, Euler's number, and the mathematical constant pi. Participants explore whether a proposed equation linking these concepts has any significance or validity, touching on themes of numerology and dimensional consistency.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the relevance of the equation involving the speed of light and Euler's number, suggesting a potential connection to computers and circles.
  • Some participants express skepticism, stating that just because an equation appears to work does not imply a meaningful relationship.
  • Another participant argues that the equation lacks dimensional consistency and questions its usefulness, particularly when changing units.
  • A participant shares a personal anecdote about a past debate regarding the nature of pi, implying that misunderstandings about mathematical concepts can persist.
  • One participant dismisses the equation as numerology, asserting that it does not hold value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the significance and validity of the proposed equation, with some dismissing it outright while others seem to acknowledge its potential interest, albeit with skepticism.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions behind the equation, particularly concerning dimensional consistency and the implications of changing units.

Joshua Morris
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is this equation of any use or in any way interesting?

CodeCogsEqn(1).gif


c = speed of light (m/s)
e = euler's number

I don't know much about physics but

2^6=log_2(64), this is a binary logarithm so would this mean that computers, the world (c and e) and circles(pi) all be related somehow by this equation?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, we've all seen things like that.

approximations.png
 
Borg said:
Yes, we've all seen things like that.

approximations.png

I don't get it
 
Joshua Morris said:
I don't get it
Just because something makes a good approximation, doesn't mean that there is a relationship.
 
Joshua Morris said:
Is this equation of any use or in any way interesting?
No. This is just numerology. Look what happens if you change units.
 
It is not dimensionally consistent so there is no point to ask about usefulness.
It does not make sense at all if c is a physical quantity and not just some arbitrary number.
Speed of light is 186 000. In miles per second. Does you relation still "works" with this number?
If you had a valid equation, changing units will not affect the validity, as long as you do it consistently.
 
This totally brings me back to when I lived in England and argued with a guy in a pub about Pi. He insisted that Pi *is* 22/7. Obviously me trying to educate him about irrational numbers was of little value.
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

EDIT -- We do not discuss numerology here on the PF. Thread will remain closed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K