How can I prove [(A^B)-(B^C)]-(A^C)'=0 using contradiction?

AI Thread Summary
To prove the equation [(A∩B)-(B∩C)]-(A∩C)'=0 by contradiction, assume it is not equal to zero, implying there exists an element x in the left-hand side. This leads to x being in A∩B but not in B∩C, while also being in A∩C. Consequently, this results in x being in A, B, and C, which contradicts the condition that x is not in B∩C. Therefore, the assumption that the expression is not equal to zero must be false, confirming that [(A∩B)-(B∩C)]-(A∩C)'=0.
mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove the following by contradiction: [(A^B)-(B^C)]-(A^C)'=0. A, B, C are sets. All I know is in order to prove by contradiction you simply set the above not equal to zero. But I don't know where to go from there.

"^" means the intersection symbol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose

(A \cap B - B \cap C) - (A \cap C)' \neq \emptyset.

Then there is some element x \in ((A \cap B - B \cap C) - (A \cap C)'). But then

x \in A \cap B - B \cap C
x \notin (A \cap C)'

<=>

x \in A \cap B - B \cap C
x \in A \cap C

<=>

x \in A \cap B
x \notin B \cap C
x \in A \cap C

<=>

x \in A
x \in B
x \notin B \cap C
x \in A
x \in C

<=>

x \in A
x \in B
x \in C
x \notin B \cap C.

Which is a contradiction.
 
Suppose it is not zero. Then there is some element x in the set on the left side.
From the last term we infer that x is not an element of (A \cap C)&#039;, (does that ' mean the complement?) so:

x \in A, \quad \mbox{and } x \in C,

take it from there.
 
Last edited:
Ok, let's prove it by contradiction:
let's suppose that
(A^B-B^C)-(A^C)'=!0, where =! means "different to". Then, there is a element namely x such that x E(belongs to) (A^B-B^C)-(A^C)', then, xE(A^B-B^C) and xE!( not belongs to)(A^C)', then, xEA^B and xE!B^C and xEA^C, then
xEA, xEB, xEC and( xE!B or xE!C). Therefore, we have a contradiction.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top