Relationship between Cp, Cv and R

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between specific heat capacities (Cp, Cv) and the gas constant (R), particularly examining the formula Cp - Cv = R/M, where M is the molecular mass of the gas. Participants are exploring whether this relationship holds universally and the implications of using different definitions of heat capacities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of including the molecular mass (M) in the relationship and whether the terms refer to specific or molar heat capacities. There is also a discussion about the clarity of the problem statement and the definitions of heat capacities being used.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the definitions of specific and molar heat capacities, while others express confusion regarding the problem's wording and assumptions. There is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation, but various perspectives are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem lacks sufficient information, which complicates the discussion. The definitions of heat capacities and the context in which they are used are under scrutiny.

PSN03
Messages
100
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Cp and Cv are specific heats at constant pressure and constant volume respectively. It is observed that
Cp−Cv =a for hydrogen gas
C p−Cv=b for nitrogen gas
The correct relation between a and b is :
Relevant Equations
Cp-Cv=R where R is gas constant
According to me a=b cause what I have been learning is R is gas constant and hence it will be same for both. But the solution have says something else.
According to them Cp-Cv=R/M where M is the molecular mass of gas.
So is the above mentioned formula correct? Do we have to take that M term always and in all the problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molar mass of the gas

(To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities instead, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads ##c_p - c_v = R##)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PSN03
etotheipi said:
If that is the original problem statement, then it's a really poorly worded question. Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molecular mass of the gas. To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads$$c_p - c_v = R$$Really the question is unanswerable unless you know whether the heat capacities are specific or molar. Furthermore, are we to assume that the mass, or alternatively the number of moles, is fixed?
Thanks a lot for your help. By the way only that much information is provided.
can I conclude that Cp/n is molar heat capacity and Cp/M is specific heat capacity and Cp is just heat capacity, right?
 
Yes, by specific it means per unit mass, and the correct relation in this case will be ##c_p - c_v = \frac{R}{\mu}##. More generally, it should be fairly clear from context which definition is being used, but it's something to be careful about!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PSN03
etotheipi said:
Yes, by specific it means per unit mass, and the correct relation in this case will be ##c_p - c_v = \frac{R}{\mu}##. More generally, it should be fairly clear from context which definition is being used, but it's something to be careful about!
Thanks a lot for your help. I was beating my head about this problem for long but finally it's done. Good day and stay safe 😊
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
etotheipi said:
Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molar mass of the gas

(To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities instead, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads ##c_p - c_v = R##)
I don’t think so, if Cp and Cv are the molar heat capacities, then Cp -Cv= R (without the n).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Chestermiller said:
I don’t think so, if Cp and Cv are the molar heat capacities, then Cp -Cv= R (without the n).

I used ##C_v## and ##C_p## for the extensive heat capacity, and ##c_p## and ##c_v## for the specific heat capacity. Then in the note at the end I mentioned that if ##c_p## and ##c_v## are instead molar heat capacities, the relation is ##c_p - c_v = R## like you say. I don't know what notation is most widely used, though!
 
etotheipi said:
I used ##C_v## and ##C_p## for the extensive heat capacity, and ##c_p## and ##c_v## for the specific heat capacity. Then in the note at the end I mentioned that if ##c_p## and ##c_v## are instead molar heat capacities, the relation is ##c_p - c_v = R## like you say. I don't know what notation is most widely used, though!
It seemed to me that the OP in post #1 was asking about the molar heat capacities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K