Relationship between Mass and Speed of Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunanda Goh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Sunanda Goh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know the relationship between m, mass and c, the speed of light ? Can anyone draw the graph for me ? Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Sunanda!

I am having difficulty understanding your question. c is constant for all frames of reference. Mass can be anything. What makes you think there is a relationship between them?

AM
 
  • Like
Likes bcrowell
Andrew Mason said:
Welcome to PF Sunanda!

I am having difficulty understanding your question. c is constant for all frames of reference. Mass can be anything. What makes you think there is a relationship between them?

AM

Oh ! Sorry for the misleading question ! What i meant, is, C is only achievable when m = 0, and when m increases, how does it affects C ? Hope you can understand my question now. I'm bad at interpreting
 
Okay. I'm changing my question. I'm confused with C just now. What i actually meant is, the maximum speed achievable.
E.g. , when m = 0 , highest v possible = C
 
There's no relationship of the sort that you're looking for. Massless particles move at speed c always; massive particles can move at any speed between zero and c.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top