Relative increase in fuel mass

schonovic
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
if a rocketship in space is approaching the speed of light and its relative mass is increasing then i assume the fuel mass is increasing which would make it more potent the closer the ship gets to the speed of light which would give it infinite force when the ship reaches the speed of light. what happens to prevent this from being true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer from the external frame of reference you imply:

As the mass of the fuel, and the rocketship itself, approaches an arbitrarily large value, so too does the force (or energy) required to accelerate it.


Wikipedia explains related aspects:

.." As seen from the center of momentum frame, the relativistic mass is also the invariant mass...For other frames, the relativistic mass ... includes a contribution from the "net" kinetic energy of the body (the kinetic energy of the center of mass of the body), and is larger the faster the body moves. Thus, unlike the invariant mass, the relativistic mass depends on the observer's frame of reference. ..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_mass
 
schonovic said:
if a rocketship in space is approaching the speed of light and its relative mass is increasing then i assume the fuel mass is increasing which would make it more potent the closer the ship gets to the speed of light which would give it infinite force when the ship reaches the speed of light. what happens to prevent this from being true?
The relativistic mass of a rocket always decreases, never increases. This is for the same reason that the non-relativistic mass of a non-relativistic rocket always decreases: you are spewing lots of mass off the back end. That effect is always greater than the relativistic mass effect.

Also, the quantity of interest is not the force, but the impulse. You can make an arbitrarily high force by reducing the duration of your burn, but that doesn't change the impulse. If you work out the math, the impulse available from the remaining fuel is always strictly decreasing and always finite.
 
If you are in a stationary reference frame and watching the ship accelerate, then the mass of fuel on board the ship increases relativistically as the ship goes faster. If you are on board the ship, the fuel mass stays the same as it always was (not counting the mass that's expelled out the rocket engine), being the same density as if the ship had no velocity.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top