Relative velocity of 2 vehicles

AI Thread Summary
Two vehicles depart from a fork, with Vehicle A traveling at 85 km/h north-east and Vehicle B at 104 km/h directly east. The discussion centers on calculating the relative velocity of Vehicle A with respect to Vehicle B using the equation aVb = Va - Vb. There is confusion regarding the direction of Vehicle B, with some participants mistakenly interpreting its direction as west. Clarifications highlight that the equation accounts for relative motion, emphasizing that if a slower vehicle is overtaken, it appears to move backward relative to the faster one. Understanding the correct application of relative velocity is crucial for accurate calculations.
Aashish Bharat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two vehicles leave simultaneously from a fork in a road. Vehicle A travels at a velocity of 85 km/h north-east. Vehicle B travels at 104 km/h directly east. Calculate the velocity of vehicle A relative to the velocity of vehicle B.

Answer (from memorandum): http://imgur.com/a/L0prH

I do not understand why is Vehicle B traveling west, an explanation on how why this was done would be appreciated!

aVb = Va - Vb (Velocity of A relative to velocity of B) when do you use this equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
 
  • Like
Likes Aashish Bharat
PeroK said:
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
Damn it, they took the opposite direction of Vb from the equation aVb = Va - Vb. I should have known better
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top