Relative velocity of 2 vehicles

AI Thread Summary
Two vehicles depart from a fork, with Vehicle A traveling at 85 km/h north-east and Vehicle B at 104 km/h directly east. The discussion centers on calculating the relative velocity of Vehicle A with respect to Vehicle B using the equation aVb = Va - Vb. There is confusion regarding the direction of Vehicle B, with some participants mistakenly interpreting its direction as west. Clarifications highlight that the equation accounts for relative motion, emphasizing that if a slower vehicle is overtaken, it appears to move backward relative to the faster one. Understanding the correct application of relative velocity is crucial for accurate calculations.
Aashish Bharat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two vehicles leave simultaneously from a fork in a road. Vehicle A travels at a velocity of 85 km/h north-east. Vehicle B travels at 104 km/h directly east. Calculate the velocity of vehicle A relative to the velocity of vehicle B.

Answer (from memorandum): http://imgur.com/a/L0prH

I do not understand why is Vehicle B traveling west, an explanation on how why this was done would be appreciated!

aVb = Va - Vb (Velocity of A relative to velocity of B) when do you use this equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
 
  • Like
Likes Aashish Bharat
PeroK said:
If you are in a car and get overtaken by another car, then relative to the faster car you are going backwards. Not so?
Damn it, they took the opposite direction of Vb from the equation aVb = Va - Vb. I should have known better
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Car in corner -- relative airflow
Replies
20
Views
3K
I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
I On whether the motion of a Foucault pendulum bob is comparable to ballistics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Relative velocity passing a ball between two soccer players
Replies
5
Views
2K
Two-dimensional perfectly inelastic collision between two vehicles
Replies
3
Views
1K
Initial velocity of a snowmobile collision
Replies
5
Views
4K
Conservation of Momentum (Explosion Kinematics)
Replies
15
Views
2K
Energy to achieve constant acceleration - F=ma and 1/2mv^2
Replies
39
Views
15K
Speed of each vehicle after the collision?
Replies
1
Views
2K
What are the initial velocities of two vehicles after a glancing collision?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top