Relative Velocity, Rigid Body Kinematics

allyfranken
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



WUDNAsS.jpg


W(oa) = -5k
α(oa) = 3k
B = 30 deg
B(dot) = -2cos 30i + 2sin30j = Vrel
b(double dot) = 4cos30i - 4sin30j)

Homework Equations


Va = Woa x Rao + Vrel


The Attempt at a Solution



This is such a simple problem and I don't know why I am messing it up. I am just trying to figure out the Va part right now. I know the answer from the back is 4.38i + 7.58j

I did Va = W(oa) x R(ao) + Vrel solving for Va.
Va = -5k x 1.25(-cos30i + sin30j) + (-2cos 30i + 2sin30j)
Va = 3.125i + 5.4j - 1.73i - 1j

Va = 1.395i - 4.4j

This is what I am getting for Va but the answer is wrong. Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please you explain your reasoning at each step?

So - by "absolute velocity" the mean the linear velocity.
What does the rotation of the disk have to do with the motion of the sphere? Are the beta figures supposed to be wrt the rotating frome of the disk?

In your equations you appear to be making angular velocity and angular acceleration equal to linear velocity and acceleration. What is the relationship between angular velocity and tangential velocity?

Note: sin(30°)=1/2, cos(30°)=(√3)/2
 
Last edited:
yes by absolute velocity i mean linear velocity.

well I know that if point A was fixed, than Va = Woa x Rao. But since it is moving, Va = Woa x Rao + Vrel. I assume that Vrel is tangent to point A in the direction: 1.255i + 2.18j. and yes angular velocity is clockwise.
 
Please answer all the questions.

Did you mix up the sin and cos?
Consider, an object on a circular path 5" from the center, angular velocity 3rad/s clockwise, has a tangential velocity 15in/s right? When the angle is position 30deg anticlockwise from the horizontal, the velocity vector makes an angle of 60 degrees clockwise from the horizontal. sin(60)=cos(30).
(draw the pic)

hence: v= [-15sin(30)i+15cos(30)j]in/s = [-(7.5)i+(7.5√3)j]in/s
note: always include the units and you don't have to expand the √3 as 1.7321 until the very end.
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top