Relative velocity with time/length contraction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in special relativity involving a spaceship traveling a distance of one light year as measured from Earth, with time dilation and length contraction effects considered from both the spaceship's and Earth's perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of gamma (γ) and Lorentz transformations to find the relative velocity of the spaceship. Questions arise about the distance traveled from different frames of reference and the correct application of the Lorentz transformation equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted calculations for velocity and distance according to different frames of reference, while others have raised concerns about the correctness of the equations used. There is an ongoing verification of results and a request for confirmation of findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of special relativity and are discussing the implications of time dilation and length contraction without reaching a consensus on the correctness of specific calculations.

theusername8
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If a spaceship travels a distance of one light year as measured from Earth in one year's time as measured from the spaceship what is the relative velocity for earth-ship. Also how far did the pilot travel according to the pilot and how long was the trip according to an earth-clock?

I found the distance of a light year. I believe that i have to use gamma as a variable to find u
but i am stuck as i don't know how to get at finding the velocity for the spaceship in order to use the time dilation and length contraction formulas.

any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theusername8 said:
If a spaceship travels a distance of one light year as measured from Earth in one year's time as measured from the spaceship what is the relative velocity for earth-ship. Also how far did the pilot travel according to the pilot and how long was the trip according to an earth-clock?

I found the distance of a light year. I believe that i have to use gamma as a variable to find u
but i am stuck as i don't know how to get at finding the velocity for the spaceship in order to use the time dilation and length contraction formulas.

any help would be greatly appreciated.
If the distance is 1 light year as reckoned from Earth's frame of reference, what is the distance traveled as reckoned from the spaceship frame of reference (in terms of γ). What is the equation for γ? If the Earth traveled this distance (backwards) in 1 year as reckoned from the spaceship frame of reference, what was its speed?

You can also solve this using the Lorentz Transformation. Set Δx = 1 lightyear, Δt' = 1 year, and Δx'=0, and solve for the velocity.

Try it both ways, and verify that you get the same answer.

Chet
 
i solved for v an got .318724c. can you please confirm this. thanks
 
theusername8 said:
i solved for v an got .318724c. can you please confirm this. thanks
That's not what I get. Please show us your work.

Chet
 
okay, i used lorentz transformation:
Δx=γ(Δx'+vt) and Δt=γ(Δt'+(vΔx/c^2))
had unknowns of v and Δt so for the first equation i solved for v and got
1ly/√(Δt^2+9.94456e14)
substituted that into the other lorentz equation and got

Δt=√1/(1-(ly/√Δt^2+9.94e14)^2/3e8) * (1+(ly^2/√(Δt^2+9.94e14))/3e16)

solving for Δt yields 3.1535e7 and plugging in that back into my equation for v i got
v=.871343c
 
now I've used this velocity to find L'
L'=1ly(1-(.873c)^2/(3e^8)^2)^1/2
simplifying i got L'= 5.17681e15m= .547ly as measured by the pilot

now for the time dilation
T=1year(1+(.871c)^2/(3e8)^2= 1.759 years as measured by an earthclock
 
Last edited:
1st: There seem to be something wrong with your Lorentz transform equations. Double check that.
2nd: Do not plug in the value for c until very last step. Plugging in any data from any problem is almost always the very last step of the solution of any problem.
 
dauto said:
1st: There seem to be something wrong with your Lorentz transform equations. Double check that.
2nd: Do not plug in the value for c until very last step. Plugging in any data from any problem is almost always the very last step of the solution of any problem.
Yes. I agree with dauto. If you are going to use the Lorentz Transformation, you need to write it down correctly. Your first equation in post #5 is incorrect. When you correct it, that will be the only equation you need to solve this problem.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K