Is Flat-Earth's Gravity Theory Flawed Due to Relativistic Acceleration?

In summary, the conversation discussed the belief of a small flat-Earth society that gravity is caused by the Earth constantly moving upwards at a constant velocity. However, this belief is not feasible as it would require a constant acceleration instead. The conversation also explored the possibility of indefinitely accelerating the Earth and how it would affect different observers. It was concluded that in relativity, acceleration is relative and the acceleration measured by a comoving inertial observer is called "proper acceleration". The conversation also mentioned that if the flat Earth was accelerating upwards with a constant proper acceleration of 1 g, the acceleration measured by an inertial observer would gradually decrease to zero.
  • #1
Mentallic
Homework Helper
3,802
95
I just recently heard about how this small but still existent flat-Earth society believe that gravity on our supposedly flat Earth is caused by the Earth always moving upward at a constant velocity.
Now obviously assuming the Earth is flat and that gravity isn't caused by mass attraction, then this still couldn't be the case because you would need a constant acceleration upwards rather than a constant velocity to have the same effect as gravity.

So I was wondering, in this scenario - whatever the force is that is accelerating the Earth - would it be possible to keep accelerating it indefinitely? From an observer not on the Earth, it would seem that the mass of Earth would increase without bound as it reaches the speed of light and thus the acceleration couldn't be maintained with the same force being applied. However, for an observer on the Earth it would still be experiencing the same acceleration since from its perspective they are still stationary in a sense.

Are both these observations correct? And would observing that the humans on Earth are experiencing the same gravity effects even when their acceleration is now negligible in the other frame of reference be pretty much the same as observing them slowing in time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
yes =)
p.s. "flat-Earth society" - fantastic...
 
  • #3
In relativity, acceleration is relative too. Although all inertial observers agree whether an object is accelerating or not, they disagree over the value of a non-zero acceleration. An inertial observer who is momentarily at rest relative to an accelerating object ("comoving inertial observer") will measure a larger acceleration than observers who have non-zero relative velocity, and the acceleration tends to zero as the relative velocity approaches the speed of light.

The acceleration measured by a comoving inertial observer is called "proper acceleration". It the "g-force" that the object experiences and what is measured by an accelerometer attached to the object.

If the "flat earth" was accelerating upwards with a constant proper acceleration of 1 g, the acceleration measured by an inertial observer would gradually decrease to zero.
 
  • #4
Thanks for your contributions :smile:
 

FAQ: Is Flat-Earth's Gravity Theory Flawed Due to Relativistic Acceleration?

What is relativistic acceleration?

Relativistic acceleration is the change in velocity of an object that is moving at speeds close to the speed of light. This type of acceleration is described by Einstein's theory of relativity and takes into account the effects of time dilation and length contraction.

How is relativistic acceleration different from classical acceleration?

Unlike classical acceleration, which is described by Newton's laws of motion, relativistic acceleration takes into account the effects of special relativity, such as the curvature of space-time and the constant speed of light. It is also a non-linear function of velocity, meaning that as an object approaches the speed of light, its acceleration decreases.

What is the formula for relativistic acceleration?

The formula for relativistic acceleration is a = γ^3 * a0, where a is the relativistic acceleration, γ is the Lorentz factor (which takes into account the object's velocity), and a0 is the object's proper acceleration (the acceleration measured by an observer at rest relative to the object).

Can an object experience relativistic acceleration without approaching the speed of light?

Yes, an object can experience relativistic acceleration without approaching the speed of light. This can happen in situations where there is a strong gravitational field, such as near a massive object like a black hole. In these cases, the object's velocity may not be close to the speed of light, but the effects of time dilation and length contraction will still be significant.

What are some real-world applications of relativistic acceleration?

Relativistic acceleration is a crucial concept in modern physics and has many practical applications. It is used in fields such as particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology to study the behavior of objects moving at high speeds or in strong gravitational fields. It is also essential for understanding technologies like GPS, which rely on the precise measurements of time and space that are affected by relativistic effects.

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top