Relativistic Energy Derivation math problem

michael154
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

In a derivation of relativistic energy (in Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 5th edition, Serway and Beichner) they use a method of integration by substitution:

Given that


F=\frac{dp}{dt}

and relativistic momentum is given by

p=\frac{mv}{\sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))}

W=∫F dx=∫\frac{dp}{dt} dx

which is fine then they say

\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{mv}{\sqrt(1−(\frac{(v^2)}{c^2}))}=\frac{m\frac{dv}{dt}}{(1−(\frac{v^2}{c^2}))^(\frac{3}{2})}


(This is about halfway through the derivation.)
its that last step that i don't understand. why does the denominator term now have a 3/2 index? and why is du/dt given like that? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
is there a missing square-root symbol?
 
michael154 said:
\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{mv}{1−(\frac{(v^2)}{c^2})}=\frac{m\frac{dv}{dt}}{(1−(\frac{v^2}{c^2}))^(\frac{3}{2})}
(d/dt)(mv(1-v2)-1/2) = m(1-v2)-1/2dv/dt -1/2(-2v)(mv)(1-v2)-3/2)dv/dt
[first term is from d/dt'ing the v in the numerator, second is from d/dt'ing the denominator]

= m(1-v2 + v2)(1-v2)-3/2dv/dt = m(1-v2)-3/2dv/dt
 
Sorry but that's not very clear. I have trouble reading non formatted math like that. As a second year physics student in uni, should I be able to do that differentiation by hand?
 
michael154 said:
Sorry but that's not very clear. I have trouble reading non formatted math like that. As a second year physics student in uni, should I be able to do that differentiation by hand?

Try looking up "chain rule". Wiki has a definition, it might not be the easiest to read. Note that you want to find (d/dt) p(t) which is equal to (d/dt) p(v(t)), and that m is assumed to be constant (not a function of time).
 
Sorry I use u instead of v for velocity

michael154 said:
Sorry but that's not very clear. I have trouble reading non formatted math like that. As a second year physics student in uni, should I be able to do that differentiation by hand?

In plain English the reason you get an exponent of -3/2 is because γ(u) is an exponent of -1/2, and what's the derivative of x-1/2? It's (-1/2)x-3/2.

I actually just posted a similar question regarding this topic, but with the time component rather than space.
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top