Relativistic Ohms Law: Modeling 1D Hot Electron Beam in Plasma

hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
33
A colleague and I are looking at modelling a hot electron beam hitting a initially charge neutral plasma. Initially we're looking at the 1D problem, the equations we're using are:
<br /> \begin{array}{rcl}<br /> \gamma^{3}(v/c)\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}+v\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) &amp; = &amp; -\frac{e}{m}E \\<br /> \frac{\partial n}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(nv) &amp; = &amp; 0 \\<br /> \frac{\partial E}{\partial t}+\frac{E}{\eta\epsilon_{0}} &amp; = &amp; \frac{nev}{\epsilon_{0}}<br /> \end{array}<br />
where e is the charge on the electron, m is the mass of the electron, \eta is the resistivity of the charge neutral plasma, v is the speed of the electrons, n is the number density of the electrons and E is the electric field produced by the electron beam. It was brought to our attention that Ohms law is not relativitically invariant but it is possible to make it so.

So my question is this, "Are the equations we have correct for a simple 1D model or do we need to change something?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in the sum on the left hand side of your first equation the units don't match.
 
Yes they do. \gamma has no units, the \partial_{t}y} and v\partial_{x}v both have units of acceleration. The first is LT^(-2), and the other is LT-1(LT^-1/L)=LT^(-2).
The units on the RHS are Newtons (eE and m is mass), so that side is acceleration also.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top