Relativistic quantum harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the relativistic quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on deriving the relativistic expression for the energy of a quantum state given a high angular frequency where kinetic energy is comparable to mc².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to combine known expressions for energy states of a quantum harmonic oscillator with relativistic mechanics but is uncertain about the correct approach. Some participants suggest considering perturbation theory to find correction terms for relativistic kinetic energy, while others question the necessity of this method given the course context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. There is a recognition of the complexity of perturbation theory, and some participants are seeking simpler alternatives to tackle the question.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that their course is introductory and has not covered perturbation theory, which may influence the methods considered appropriate for solving the problem.

lonewolf5999
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The question is as follows:

Suppose that, in a particular oscillator, the angular frequency w is so large that its kinetic energy is comparable to mc2. Obtain the relativistic expression for the energy, En of the state of quantum number n.

I don't know how to begin solving this question. I know the expressions for the energy states of a quantum harmonic oscillator, and relativistic mechanics. How do I combine the two together? Do I simply append the expression for rest-mass energy, E=m0c2 to the expression for the energy of the quantum harmonic oscillator, En= (n + 1/2) (hw/2pi) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not exactly sure how accurate the question wants the answer. But one method you can do is find the correction term in relativistic kinetic energy, O(p4). Then treat this as a perturbation and solve for the first order perturbation energy term and add it in.
 
Hmm. The course I'm doing is an introductory quantum mechanics course, so I haven't covered anything on perturbations. The perturbation theory article on Wikipedia seems a little too complex to be covered in one sitting, so I'll try to look up perturbations elsewhere. But since I haven't covered perturbations, I don't think that this question requires the use of that. Is there any simpler method of arriving at the answer, and if so, how do I begin my solution?

Thanks for the reply.
 
I apologize for double posting, but is there anybody else who could help me with this problem?
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K