Relativistic Velocity: Can I Run Faster Than Light?

profilexis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would have another question. If I travel at the speed of light (or 99.9999999999...% of the speed of light) in a spaceship and i begin to run from the back of the spaceship to the front in direction of the spaceship movement, will I be moving faster than the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope.
As measured from the Earth frame (in which the spacecraft has the velocity indicated), you'd be measured to have a velocity strictly below c.
 
You cannot just add velocities to get total velocity. Use:
w = (u + v)/ (1 + uv/c2)
If you define all the velocities in terms of light speed by dividing each one by “c” the formula is simpler and becomes:

w = (u + v)/ (1 + uv)

You’re more accustomed to living and working with speeds less than 0.0005
Where doubling that speed gives you
.001 / 1.00000025

You’ve just never needed the accuracy of dividing by such a small number at those small speeds. And just used the .001 part or (u + v).

But as one of the speeds becomes high, say above .25
Then using the whole formula and dividing becomes important.
 
profilexis said:
I would have another question. If I travel at the speed of light (or 99.9999999999...% of the speed of light) in a spaceship and i begin to run from the back of the spaceship to the front in direction of the spaceship movement, will I be moving faster than the speed of light?
The ... means the 9's go on forever? That means you are traveling exactly the speed of light. This is impossible, unless, like a photon, you have zero mass.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top