- #1

- 1

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter mlh3789
- Start date

- #1

- 1

- 0

- #2

- 2,952

- 1

The the correct expression for the Lorentz force on a relativistic particle in an EM field is no different than the same expression for a non-relativistic particle, i.e. in MKS units

This is not a 4-tensor equation though. If you're speaking about the tensor formulation then its taks on a different form. The tensor form is d

Pete

- #3

- 458

- 1

In cgs gaussian units, just divide v by c, unless you have set c=1.

- #4

- 24

- 0

- #5

Jonathan Scott

Gold Member

- 2,341

- 1,088

I'm interested to see that someone is being taught about this way of getting the Lorentz force law from a Lagrangian. It makes it possible to see how adding the charge times the four-potential to the four-momentum (as in the Pauli "minimal electromagnetic coupling" assumption) gives a Lagrangian which results in exactly the same law of motion for charged particles as the Lorentz force law. That puzzled me for a long time until I worked it out for myself, which isn't difficult but I didn't see it mentioned in the text books which I used.

As mentioned in a previous response, the Lorentz force law is already relativistic. That means all you have to do is write out the Euler-Lagrange equations, recognize which partial derivatives of the four-potential correspond to the E and B fields and reorganize the result to show that it matches the Lorentz force law. I'm leaving the details as an exercise for the student.

Share: