Relativity Breakdown: Explained for Non-Scientists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pjpic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Is there a standard explination, for the non-scientist, why realitivity breaks down at small scales? Is is because, if an object get small enough (but before it gets to a dimensionaless point) its gravity becomes infinity strong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Who says relativity breaks down at small scales? We don't see any relativistic failures in atomic or subatomic physics.
 
Pjpic, General Relativity breaks down at scales so small that gravity becomes strong enough to induce quantum effects.

An estimate of this scale can be made as follows. For a particle of mass m there is a distance associated with its quantum effects known as the Compton wavelength, h/mc. If you try to confine a particle within a region of this size, pair production will occur and the single-particle description will no longer suffice. The distance associated with the gravitational effects of the particle is the Schwarzschild radius, 2Gm/c2. Breakdown occurs when these two distances are comparable, h/mc ~ Gm/c2. This happens at a mass m ~ √(hc/G) known as the Planck mass, and a distance r ~ √(hG/c3) known as the Planck distance.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top