Removing CH3I: Designing Containment Filtered Venting System EUF

  • Thread starter Thread starter wang-nuclear
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of effectively removing CH3I in a containment filtered venting system using Sodium Thiosulfate (Na2S2O3). Despite designing a venturi tube submerged in a sodium thiosulfate solution, the removal efficiency of CH3I has been disappointingly low. Suggestions include using strong oxidants like ozone to break down the methyl group, but concerns about practicality and cost arise, especially since the system is part of a larger design that mandates the use of sodium thiosulfate. The participants are seeking alternative substances that can react with sodium thiosulfate and are water-soluble, as they wish to avoid redesigning the entire system. Overall, the focus remains on improving the effectiveness of CH3I removal without altering the established design framework.
wang-nuclear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are designing containment filtered venting system EUF. Everything is smooth except removing CH3I. We have tried a lot of methods including using Na2S2O3(Sodium Thiosulfate).We designed a venturi tube and it was located under sodium thiosulfate solution. When CH3I goes trough the equipment,it should be romoved.But our experiment shows the effectiveness is very low.t seems not work. Can anyone tell me some information about this expriment,espercially the experiment condition?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
wang-nuclear said:
We are designing containment filtered venting system EUF. Everything is smooth except removing CH3I. We have tried a lot of methods including using Na2S2O3(Sodium Thiosulfate).We designed a venturi tube and it was located under sodium thiosulfate solution. When CH3I goes trough the equipment,it should be romoved.But our experiment shows the effectiveness is very low.t seems not work. Can anyone tell me some information about this expriment,espercially the experiment condition?

I'm not a chemist and this is a physics forum, but have you tried adding a strong oxidant such as ozone to first break up the methyl group, so the thiosulphate could then take care of the iodine?

CH3I in the atmosphere tends to interact with and get broken down by naturally occurring ozone (http://www.uea.ac.uk/~e780/iodcycle.htm ). I imagine though that this wouldn't work well in a hydrogen-rich atmosphere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your help. Our system is a part of a bigger system and the other designing has been finished(by another institute).We are required to use Sodium Thiosulfate or the whole designing needs to te changed. all experiments need to be made again.It is the last thing we want to see. Besides, the system won't be started except under accident condition.As a result, if we use ozone,we need a big container to storage ozone and the cost as well as difficulties will be out of our affording ability. But is there any substance with the ability to react with Sodium Thiosulfate that can dissolve in water ?
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top