nismaratwork
- 358
- 0
Proton Soup said:ja, it's in the link i just posted. crazy with a capital c in an odd font.
Yeah, it's already been made clear that this man is not sane... I think the picture drives it home. Arildno (and all): http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/01/11/arizona.funeral.westboro/index.html?hpt=T1
I'm no fan of angels, but these I'll root for. Silently protecting... that sounds about right.Ivan: I want to agree with you, and I want to dig into the politics, but unless this man has fooled virtually everyone for many years, he's been progressively more aggressive, and delusional. People often think, "of course, crazy means violent..."... no. Crazy (I use this term loosely) is crazy, but undiagnosed/untreated crazy... THAT often does end in violence. I should add, that violence is usually random and hysterical, or self-inflicted... if as I suspect Loughner is Schizophrenic or DD:NOS.
In the words of his teacher, "[Loughner] scared the hell out of me." His friends seemed unsurprised at these events, but his parents by all accounts are shocked and devastated *nod to arildno*. A neighbor spoke to CNN and described the father as unable to put together 3 words without breaking down into tears, and the mother is even worse. To me, that seems to indicate either a long struggle, or in this case perhaps, not fully realizing just how ill their child was... after all, he'd only moved home recently.
If anyone can explain to me why the discussion is political instead of focusing on how someone with YEARS of intervention by police, even after his expulsion from college under the order that he receive a psych evaluation before attempting to return... well, I'd be impressed. In subsequent run-ins with the police, at no point does it seem that anyone questioned his sanity; clearly the guy was nuts. It also seems clear that nobody sought to have him held for 72 hours, or so much as an evaluation with a court-appointed psychologist.
People always talk about, "what failed?" in these situations... we don't know exactly how, but we know what failed was: his brain and mind. If there were systemic failures, his parents aren't it... he's 22... the college protected their campus and told him to get help! The police probably didn't have time to get a bead on just what they were dealing with, AND convince brass or a judge.
This is absolutely the kind of person who, if he couldn't get a gun, would use ANYTHING. A bomb, a knife... it doesn't matter anymore. If there's a gun-control issue here, it would just be a renewal of the assault-weapons ban, which had it been renewed could have made one huge difference:
33 round magazines are VERBOTEN under that law, and what was the point of failure for this mass attack?... the magazine, and the need to reload. I'd love to hear why joe-citizen could possibly need that.
I'd also love to know why such a crazy bastard, with a police record, a drug record with the military, and two failed school experiences including 'get help' on that last... BOUGHT A GUN and a multiple extended magazines. He was refused ammo at one store, but not the gun. I don't think that tragedy would be averted that way... it's too easy to find a gun, but could this lunatic have found one through illegal channels? If he did, it have been another point of weakness where he could have been arrested.
My point isn't that gun control is the needed debate, but we should still ask ourselves how on Earth 'Shaved-Head McManson' was able to walk up to a counter, and buy a glock.
