Request for Opinion on DW's Excellent Website - Geocities.com/zcphysicsms

  • Thread starter Thread starter pmb_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Request
pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
I am told by dw (aka david waite) that there are people here who have posted a comment stating how they love his website, which is at

http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/

and that they have told dw how "excellant" it is. Actually to be precise dw tells us that
The only "people" there who don't like my writtings are you and your alter ego. Others make reference to my site and call it "excellent", etc.
I'm curious who these "other" people are and I'm curious as to what you find excellant about it. The reason I want to know is that the people I've talked to in private have a very low opinion of it and I'd like to know why the big difference if there indeed is a real difference and not one that has been created in the mind of dw.

Thank you for your opinion.

Pete

ps - In'm not interested in the opinion of GRCQ which is dw's alter ego.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pmb_phy said:
I am told by dw (aka david waite) that there are people here who have posted a comment stating how they love his website, which is at

http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/

and that they have told dw how "excellant" it is. Actually to be precise dw tells us that

I'm curious who these "other" people are and I'm curious as to what you find excellant about it. The reason I want to know is that the people I've talked to in private have a very low opinion of it and I'd like to know why the big difference if there indeed is a real difference and not one that has been created in the mind of dw.

Thank you for your opinion.

Pete

ps - In'm not interested in the opinion of GRCQ which is dw's alter ego.
Don't lie. I am DW, not GRCQ etc. Agreeing with me against you does not make people me. This thread you started is an off topic troll for a fight. Moderators, please do something about this guy!
 
For Christ's sake, you two, grow up or we're going to separate you and instate a 12-inch rule.

Really, if you guys are going to continue to have this much personal drama, please keep it to PMs and emails. We really don't need it on this forum.

- Warren
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top