GrahamN-UK said:
In the new pictures (thanks) I can't see any strapping on the T1 transformer for 240 V operation (top row) or 120 V operation (bottom row).
The straps go over the barriers on the terminal strips and are hard to see, but do exist and are visible on an enlarged view of the image.
Asymptotic said:
Another thing that catches my eye is 2A fuses for a 100VA transformer. I'm not particularly sanguine using one on the 120V secondary (2A fuse/0.83 FLA = 240%) let alone for the primary (if 240V, then 2A fuse/0.42A at full load; fuse rating is 480% of transformer rating). 2A fuses will prevent wiring from burning up, but do squat for transformer overload protection.
Those fuse ratings seem reasonable when you take into account the in-rush currents of the transformer and of the contactors/relays. Time Delay fuses at closer to rated current are an option but are seldom seen in practice.
If power is applied to the transformer when the AC line is near its peak in the same phase as when the power was removed, the core may go into saturation for the first half cycle, causing a brief, high in-rush current.
The same happens with the contactors, but even worse is the in-rush current until the armature pulls in and completes the magnetic circuit. The coil inrush current is 5 to 10 times the sealed current.
See page 3/50 of:
http://www.klocknermoeller.com/klockner.moeller/klockner.moeller.pdf/sec_3.pdf
Control transformers are designed to handle these in-rush currents by using more Iron in the core to prevent saturation during momemtary overloads and larger wire sizes to decrease resistive losses. Due to this, they are a "stiff" supply with good load regulation and can typically be run at full rated power almost indefinitely.
Kurtisinger said:
It appears to me that the motor has been rebuilt or at least apart because some of the fins on the rotor are bent and almost all of them have been scuffed on the corners. There isn't any scuffing to the case and the bearings are tight. I am wondering if it was my setup that caused it or if it was already on its way out the door.
That's problably why they unloaded it!

The photo of the rotor indicates the fault occurred during a powered startup, otherwise the burn mark wouldn't be concentrated in one spot.
The photo of the burnt winding has what looks like a piece of metal sticking out at the fault location. This could well be the base cause of failure, perhaps a leftover from a previous rebuild. A rewind is due in any case.
EDIT: A closer look shows that "piece of metal' is probably a lead wire.
Still seems like a good deal.
Cheers,
Tom