Requirements for an observable pattern in young's experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the requirements for observing an interference pattern in Young's experiment. Polarization is addressed, noting that while polarized light is typically assumed, unpolarized light can still produce observable fringes if the polarization direction is consistent. Coherence is clarified, emphasizing the importance of spatial and temporal coherence, which can be optimized by using narrow slits and minimizing the distance between them. The use of lasers is highlighted due to their monochromatic nature and brightness, making them ideal for the experiment. Overall, understanding these factors is crucial for successfully demonstrating interference patterns.
Andy123
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It's not in fact a question of homework but something I have been wondering but cannot get answers about the requirements for an observable pattern in young's experiment:

1. Polarisation: In my study, the book derived the intensity function of light assuming the light beams are polarised. But I wonder if the experiment will work if unpolarised light beam is used, or the light beams have different degree of polarisation exiting the two slits?

2. Coherence: Some information from the internet tells that "coherence" of light beam from the two slits are not actually important. But its the "spatial coherence" and "temporal coherence" that matter. I am confused by what these terms mean and cannot understand anything by referring the wikipedia.

3. Laser: Why is laser used mostly in the experiment? I understand that it is "more monochromatic" than the other light. (although I don't why) But besides that, what else matter?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



That's all the requirements I can think of for the young's experiment. I tried to answer the above questions but I failed. Please help! Thanks![/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young's_interference_experiment

You need slits that are very thin and spaced a reasonable distance apart to make the formulas work. The slits must be in an opaque material.

You need a relatively bright source of light. Mono-chromatic works better, but Young used sun light. A laser is a very convenient source of mono-chromatic light, and it is also very bright so you can easily see it.

You need an opaque "box" to perform the experiment in. You want the light to come in only through the slits so you can see the pattern.

You need some nice measuring equipment to know how far apart your slits are, how wide each slit is, and to lay out your observation screen.

Some kind of way to record your results is good. These days a digital camera such as on a cell phone would probably be quite adequate.
 
Andy123 said:
1. Polarisation: In my study, the book derived the intensity function of light assuming the light beams are polarised. But I wonder if the experiment will work if unpolarised light beam is used, or the light beams have different degree of polarisation exiting the two slits?
If the polarization of the light is position independent, interference fringes can still be observed. In order to understand this, you can think of an unpolarized light as a lightbeam whose polarization direction rotates randomly with time- But since the fringe structure is independent on the polarization orientation of the interfering beams (so long as both are polarized at the same direction), a stable and by-eyes-observable fringes can be observed. This issue is actually what Fresnel-Arago experiments dealt with hundred years ago.
Andy123 said:
2. Coherence: Some information from the internet tells that "coherence" of light beam from the two slits are not actually important. But its the "spatial coherence" and "temporal coherence" that matter. I am confused by what these terms mean and cannot understand anything by referring the wikipedia.
As DEvens said, the effect of partial coherence can be minimized by making the slits narrow enough and not separating them too far.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top