Research: Applied vs. Fundamental

AI Thread Summary
Graduating with a B.S. in physics and transitioning to a Ph.D. program in nanoscale science raises questions about future research opportunities, particularly in fundamental areas like particle physics. Concerns revolve around whether a specialization in applied physics will limit access to postdoctoral positions in more theoretical fields. While some believe that a shortage of candidates in particle physics could open doors, others emphasize that the focus on nanoscale science signifies a commitment to that field. The discussion highlights the strong job prospects for nanoscientists in academia, suggesting that once tenure is achieved, researchers may have the freedom to explore diverse topics. Ultimately, the choice of specialization may restrict future experimentation with different fields.
DanielFaraday
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I'm graduating with a B.S. in physics and I will soon be starting a Ph.D. program in nanoscale science, which is essentially an applied physics program. I chose this program because my undergraduate research was focused in this area and I've really enjoyed it.

However, I'm wondering if my choice of Ph.D. program will limit my future opportunities to applied research only. There are some topics that I would love to research, such as particle physics, which are quite fundamental. Would I be able to get a post doc position in particle physics with a Ph.D. in nanoscale science, or would these positions only be offered to students that specifically researched particle physics as graduate students? At what point should you stop experimenting with different fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is a shortage of particle physics PhD students then you might have a chance. But that's like saying if there is shortage of water in the UK then France might make some money exporting it. On the brighter side, the faculty job prospects are good for nanoscientists. And once you have tenure you can research what you want...

Reality check - you *have* stopped experimenting with different fields. You are now a nanoscientist.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
112
Back
Top