Is Pursuing Quantum Computing Feasible with a Mechanical Engineering Background?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a graduate degree in quantum computing can be challenging for an undergraduate with a background in Mechanical Engineering, especially without relevant coursework in math or computer science. Self-study is essential, but formal qualifications in these areas are typically required for admission to graduate programs. The field of quantum algorithms is well-established, and having a strong foundation in physics or math is crucial for success. Given the limited number of positions in quantum computing, it may be wise to remain open to various physics specializations. Ultimately, focusing on core physics studies while exploring quantum computing independently may be the best approach.
Abhishek Sethi
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I am an undergraduate student from India. Pursuing double major in Physics and Mechanical Engineering.

I have completed 4 semesters(2 years) of my college. I had taken a class titled "Quantum information and computing" and it interested me a lot. I really love math and computations involved.
I am getting interested in theory and algorithms aspect of quantum computing.

My question is, how hard will it be to pursue quantum computing as my field for a grad school (maybe for a PhD), given that I will be doing irrelevant Mechanical Engineering courses.
I cannot take any math or CS classes simply because I won't be having slots which will make me complete my degrees on time (I am planning to complete my classes in 4years and 1 year of thesis).

I understand that I need to relevant math/CS courses, but I will be practically restricted.
However, I can put efforts and study relevant non-physics things on my own.

Another question I want to ask is, how do I proceed with these conditions?
I cannot change my second major to CS, but I can drop Mechanical Engineering and pursue 5 classes as my open elective.
Also, any suggestions on what text/ lectures to follow in order to understand the stuff better.
Right now, I am following Nielsen and Chuang, and doing well with it.

Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One professor told me the best path with grad school is go directly to the journals and keep researching until you find a someone or a team who's work is what you want to do, approach them directly, and then let the rest work itself out. With a path as new and undefined as Quantum Computing, it may be the way to go.
 
From what I know, it would also be a good idea to search for research papers in the theoretical computer science and cryptography as both fields involve the quantum computation.
 
Fooality said:
With a path as new and undefined as Quantum Computing, it may be the way to go.

The problem here is that whereas experimental QC is a new(ish) field the math/algorithms field has been around for quite a while; at least since the mid-80s (Shor's algorithm was published in 1994). Hence, it is a small but quite well researched field. This means that people already working in the field would know what kind of background is needed: typically a background in physics or math (or math-heavy CS),
Hence, having an ME background will be definite disadvantage and self-study on its own won't help: you need to pass exams in order to show that you actually know the material.
I am not sure there is a good solution to this. At the end of the day you need to study the topics relevant to what you actually want to do later on; which in the real world is sometimes easier said than done.

Also, did I mention that this is a small field? I would never recommend anyone who is at the undergraduate level to make life-changing choices based on some idea that they want is career in a field where the total number of permanent positions in the whole world is probably lower than 100 (even if you go to a large QC conference you will only find a small number of people who actually works on algorithms).
If you are interested in physics then study physics (maybe with a "high-level specialization such as condensed matter,. astrophysics or whatever) and keep an open mind for when it comes to what precise field you want to work in because that is always going to be largely out of your control.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Truecrimson
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top