Residential DC power distribution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of residential DC power distribution using a 24V 4A lead-acid battery bank. Participants suggest using buck DC-DC converters instead of linear voltage regulators for better efficiency and to avoid power loss as heat. Adjustable outlets with these converters can accommodate various voltage requirements for devices, while maintaining a stable voltage supply is crucial to prevent fluctuations. Concerns about voltage drop over long distances are raised, emphasizing the importance of proper wiring and circuit planning. Overall, the consensus is that a well-designed system can effectively distribute DC power throughout a residence.
sumdood
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Residential DC power distribution, well that’s the end goal. The main question is about stepping down a 24v 4amp lead acid deep cycle battery bank to accommodate normal DC usage voltage. For example 24v 4amp too: 12v 1a, 5v 400ma, 9v .4a, 12v 2a. Was thinking of making adjustable outlets so they can be changed using a potentiometer to fit common device’s specs.

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm138.pdf
If you checkout the datasheet on page 11 it has a “1.2v -25 Adjustable Regulator”. Would that circuit design work for this application? On page 11 there is also an “Adjustable Regulator with Improved Ripple Rejection”.
Any gotcha’s? Any advice, anything to watch out for? Or would that even work?

I’ve read this guy’s paper but think most of this doesn’t apply to my situation being that I’m never going to connect to the main AC power grid. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=toledo1355247158&disposition=inlineb
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sumdood said:
Residential DC power distribution, well that’s the end goal. The main question is about stepping down a 24v 4amp lead acid deep cycle battery bank to accommodate normal DC usage voltage. For example 24v 4amp too: 12v 1a, 5v 400ma, 9v .4a, 12v 2a. Was thinking of making adjustable outlets so they can be changed using a potentiometer to fit common device’s specs.

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm138.pdf
If you checkout the datasheet on page 11 it has a “1.2v -25 Adjustable Regulator”. Would that circuit design work for this application? On page 11 there is also an “Adjustable Regulator with Improved Ripple Rejection”.
Any gotcha’s? Any advice, anything to watch out for? Or would that even work?

I’ve read this guy’s paper but think most of this doesn’t apply to my situation being that I’m never going to connect to the main AC power grid. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=toledo1355247158&disposition=inlineb

Welcome to the PF.

No, you would not use a linear voltage regulator for this application. You will be wasting most of your battery's power in making heat.

Instead, look into Buck DC-DC regulators. You can make them adjustable as well. :smile:
 
Awesome, thanks for the reply. Didn’t think anybody had responded yet because the notification email went to junk mail. Buck converter operations was interesting. Think I found a few boards that would work.

This guy for laptop or higher amp required devices.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IOMSWUQ/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Low power consumption items
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009HPB1OI/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Something for LED array
http://www.ebay.com/itm/DC-Buck-Step-Down-Converter-DC-5A-Regulator-Voltage-Current-Adjustable-HM-/400714751657

Forgive me if I’m not making sense with something or show lack of understanding. Don’t have a strong background in elc. engineering. Here is the conclusion with a few questions. Please, if something sounds silly or not right, let me know.

To achieve a basic type of DC power distribution (that’s flexible at the ports) I could wire these buck converter boards in parallel with the battery bank and it should work…right? All of these boards have a certain level of voltage regulation. Meaning, when the battery storage voltage fluctuation the buck boards compensate for the change. Think each board listed above has its own input voltage fluctuation specs. Just not sure what is going to happen to line voltage if all the boards are connected and drawing power at the same time.

Think in the thesis paper posted at the start of the thread he talked about having a voltage regulator/smoother close to the battery bank to ensure power lines have steady voltage. Would something like that be necessary to ensure proper distribution? As I understand it a lead acid bank can fluctuate by two or three volts, especially if charging during power consumption?

Side note: safety, safety should never be a side note.
The current wiring for residential homes…or for any building for that matter have different circuits that are all fuse protected. I expect to have the same setup but it would be nice to reuse an old car fuse box for the project, if anybody has any ideas?

Sorry if I seem a bit novice. Not trying to reinvent the wheel so if something like this is already consumer available I would love to check it out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi there

As Berkeman said, DC-DC buck regulators are the way to go for best efficiency

sumdood said:
For example 24v 4amp too: 12v 1a, 5v 400ma, 9v .4a, 12v 2a.

you just need a single 12V reg not two and a 5V and 9V ones
The 12V one just needs to be able to handle ~ 4A max to give some headroom over the 3A max you expect from it.

you could use one of these for the 12V 3A rail ...
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/DC-DC-CC-CV-Buck-Converter-Step-down-Power-Supply-Module-7-32V-to-0-8-28V-12A-TR-/141382431018?_trksid=p2054897.l5669

and a couple of these for the 5V and 9V lower current rails ...
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/2pcs-LM2596S-Power-module-Step-Down-Module-DC-DC-Buck-Converter-new-/331303638307?_trksid=p2054897.l4275

that would keep you out of trouble :)

Now the only other thing you probably haven't considered is the large voltage drops you will get running low voltage DC around the house. You haven't said what sort of lengths of cable runs you will have on these lines ... but it is likely to cause additional problems as the current drawn is increased

cheers
Dave
 
Hi…good point about wire gauge, distance and amp being drawn effecting line voltage. Think this is a nice resource to get an idea of what is possible and to mess around with configuration. http://www.calculator.net/voltage-d...tance=20&distanceunit=feet&amperes=1&x=41&y=7

I’m not planning for any round trip distances longer then 150feet, MAX. I’m hoping the trick is keeping the system as a whole at 24v then stepping down when needed, not running any circuits dedicated to low voltage. More of having a circuit categories. Example: low-mid watt devices, mid-high watt devices, and dedicated circuits for one particular device. Planning the circuits based on usage and wattage of dedicated devices on them and that circuit’s ability to dynamically add/change common usage devices at will, aka plug/unplug move device. Does that make sense? I attached a drawing of what I’m thinking.

mBrs8nJ.png


Link to details for #3 in the drawing http://www.ebay.com/itm/DC-Buck-Step-Down-Converter-DC-5A-Regulator-Voltage-Current-Adjustable-HM-/400714751657

Link to details for #4 in the drawing http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/DC-DC-CC-CV-Buck-Converter-Step-down-Power-Supply-Module-7-32V-to-0-8-28V-12A-TR-/141382431018?_trksid=p2054897.l5669&clk_rvr_id=693475846925

It would probably have to be a balance/dance of devices, distance and usage. Could something like in the drawing work correctly?
 
It would probably have to be a balance/dance of devices, distance and usage.

yup, I would have the highest current drawing devices the closest to the main power source
dropping off to the lowest ones at the ends of the cable runs

and yes, running 24V throughout and regulating down at the required points would be the best solution for keeping V-drops to a minimum :smile:

Dave
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top